[jira] [Reopened] (QPID-3542) Java client does not ack non-matching messages when using client side selectors (CPP Broker)

2011-10-17 Thread Keith Wall (Reopened) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Keith Wall reopened QPID-3542: -- Reopening as behaviour in the following scenario is not correct: In the case where client side filtering

Address node type resolution issues

2011-10-17 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Why do we resolve Address node types? This question arose during review of proposed updates to the Address syntax implementation for the Java client, but ultimately looks to be a wider question for all the clients and so I am asking it here outwith that review. The documentation for the Address

Re: Address node type resolution issues

2011-10-17 Thread Rajith Attapattu
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote: Why do we resolve Address node types? This question arose during review of proposed updates to the Address syntax implementation for the Java client, but ultimately looks to be a wider question for all the clients

Re: Address node type resolution issues

2011-10-17 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On 17 October 2011 16:01, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote: Why do we resolve Address node types? This question arose during review of proposed updates to the Address syntax implementation for the Java

Re: Address node type resolution issues

2011-10-17 Thread Rajith Attapattu
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 October 2011 16:01, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote: Why do we resolve Address node types? This question arose during

Re: Address node type resolution issues

2011-10-17 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On 17 October 2011 20:58, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 October 2011 16:01, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com