[jira] [Assigned] (QPID-509) Messages to topics are sent with mandatory flag set to true, should be false

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey reassigned QPID-509: Assignee: Rob Godfrey Messages to topics are sent with mandatory flag set to true, should be

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-509) Messages to topics are sent with mandatory flag set to true, should be false

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey updated QPID-509: - Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) Messages to topics are sent with mandatory flag set to

[jira] [Assigned] (QPID-509) Messages to topics are sent with mandatory flag set to true, should be false

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey reassigned QPID-509: Assignee: Robbie Gemmell (was: Rob Godfrey) Robbie - can you review? Messages to

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-509) Messages to topics are sent with mandatory flag set to true, should be false

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey updated QPID-509: - Fix Version/s: 0.15 Messages to topics are sent with mandatory flag set to true, should be false

[jira] [Closed] (QPID-3774) [Java Broker] Allow out of order completion of persistent enqueues / dequeues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Keith Wall closed QPID-3774. Resolution: Fixed [Java Broker] Allow out of order completion of persistent enqueues / dequeues

[jira] [Reopened] (QPID-3774) [Java Broker] Allow out of order completion of persistent enqueues / dequeues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Keith Wall reopened QPID-3774: -- Assignee: Keith Wall (was: Rob Godfrey) Test case AcknowledgeTest was seen to fail occasionally on

[jira] [Assigned] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey reassigned QPID-792: Assignee: Rob Godfrey (was: Rajith Attapattu) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-2390) Expose Queue Purge functionalitiy for test clean up.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey resolved QPID-2390. --- Resolution: Won't Fix We've not had any need for this feature up till now, and with AMQP 1-0 removing

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey updated QPID-792: - Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey updated QPID-792: - Fix Version/s: 0.15 Assignee: Robbie Gemmell (was: Rob Godfrey) Robbie - can you review? thx

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-2142) Need wireshark plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Huston resolved QPID-2142. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.10 The 0-10 wireshark dissector was submitted back to the

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217306#comment-13217306 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-792: --- {code} + // TODO - should really validate

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217310#comment-13217310 ] Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-792: -- I'm strongly of the opinion that when you create a

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217337#comment-13217337 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-792: --- Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. I

[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217337#comment-13217337 ] Rajith Attapattu edited comment on QPID-792 at 2/27/12 6:09 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3870) C++ tests based on python don't always have correct PYTHONPATH on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217370#comment-13217370 ] Chuck Rolke commented on QPID-3870: --- Steve, Your checkin didn't include the file

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3870) C++ tests based on python don't always have correct PYTHONPATH on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217412#comment-13217412 ] Steve Huston commented on QPID-3870: Oops, sorry, Chuck. I just added test_env.ps1.in

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217431#comment-13217431 ] Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-792: -- We should really take this discussion off this JIRA and

[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217431#comment-13217431 ] Rob Godfrey edited comment on QPID-792 at 2/27/12 7:31 PM: --- We

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3867) AMQQueueMBean#clearQueue|moveMessages|copyMessages should be certain to rollback transactions in the event of exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217556#comment-13217556 ] Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-3867: -- I can agree with that...but yes, seperate JIRA

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-509) Messages to topics are sent with mandatory flag set to true, should be false

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217571#comment-13217571 ] Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-509: - Changes seem reasonable to me.

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-509) Messages to topics are sent with mandatory flag set to true, should be false

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-509. - Resolution: Fixed Messages to topics are sent with mandatory flag set to true, should be

[jira] [Assigned] (QPID-2020) AMQConnection.create[Durable]ConnectionConsumer should do something better than just return null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey reassigned QPID-2020: - Assignee: Rob Godfrey AMQConnection.create[Durable]ConnectionConsumer should do something

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-2020) AMQConnection.create[Durable]ConnectionConsumer should do something better than just return null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217600#comment-13217600 ] Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-2020: --- Reading the javadoc throws JMSException - if the

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-792. - Resolution: Fixed I'm going to go ahead and accept the changes on this for now, they seem

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217625#comment-13217625 ] Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-792: -- bq. I realise forcing users to specify queue or topic

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-2020) AMQConnection.create[Durable]ConnectionConsumer should do something better than just return null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217627#comment-13217627 ] Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-2020: -- I think I recall seeing a JIRA raised not that

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217631#comment-13217631 ] Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-792: - True enough. We actually already have queue. and

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-2020) AMQConnection.create[Durable]ConnectionConsumer should do something better than just return null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217633#comment-13217633 ] Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-2020: --- Indeed - QPID-3693

Review Request: QPID-3799 C++ Broker ACL additions and cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4063/ --- Review request for qpid, Gordon Sim, Ted Ross, and rajith attapattu. Summary

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-2020) AMQConnection.create[Durable]ConnectionConsumer should do something better than just return null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217635#comment-13217635 ] Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-2020: -- Was about to post that but you beat me to it

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3799) ACL processing by C++ broker produces unexpected results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217640#comment-13217640 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3799: -

[jira] [Assigned] (QPID-2020) AMQConnection.create[Durable]ConnectionConsumer should do something better than just return null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey reassigned QPID-2020: - Assignee: Robbie Gemmell (was: Rob Godfrey) Well - while you're here... would you mind reviewing

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-2020) AMQConnection.create[Durable]ConnectionConsumer should do something better than just return null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-2020. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.15 Gah, ok then...even though it isn't Ready To

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-3867) AMQQueueMBean#clearQueue|moveMessages|copyMessages should be certain to rollback transactions in the event of exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-3867. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.15 I'm just closing this out. If the queue depth

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-3175) SSL support in Python client libraries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-3175: - Labels: possibly_complete (was: ) SSL support in Python client libraries

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-2142) Need wireshark plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217653#comment-13217653 ] Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-2142: -- Excellent, thanks for the update.

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-2142) Need wireshark plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217683#comment-13217683 ] Jose Pedro Oliveira commented on QPID-2142: --- Complementary information: You need

[jira] [Assigned] (QPID-2621) Calling QueueBrowser.getEnumeration on a stopped connection will hang

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey reassigned QPID-2621: - Assignee: Rob Godfrey Calling QueueBrowser.getEnumeration on a stopped connection will hang

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-2621) Calling QueueBrowser.getEnumeration on a stopped connection will hang

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey updated QPID-2621: -- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) Calling QueueBrowser.getEnumeration on a stopped

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-2621) Calling QueueBrowser.getEnumeration on a stopped connection will hang

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey updated QPID-2621: -- Fix Version/s: 0.15 Assignee: Robbie Gemmell (was: Rob Godfrey) Robbie - would you be so good

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-2621) Calling QueueBrowser.getEnumeration on a stopped connection will hang

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robbie Gemmell resolved QPID-2621. -- Resolution: Fixed Looks good to me. Calling QueueBrowser.getEnumeration on a

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-2142) Need wireshark plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217708#comment-13217708 ] Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-2142: -- Great, thanks :) Need

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-3422) Implement ring queue on java broker

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey updated QPID-3422: -- Component/s: (was: Java Client) Implement ring queue on java broker

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-3495) Bidirectional messaging using the same queue causes cluster node restart to fail.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey updated QPID-3495: -- Component/s: (was: Java Client) Bidirectional messaging using the same queue causes cluster

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-2478) JMSDestinationTest.testGetDestinationWithCustomExchange() fails against java broker if java.0-10.testprofile is not used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217765#comment-13217765 ] Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-2478: --- Seems like some time in the last two years whatever

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-2478) JMSDestinationTest.testGetDestinationWithCustomExchange() fails against java broker if java.0-10.testprofile is not used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rob Godfrey resolved QPID-2478. --- Resolution: Cannot Reproduce JMSDestinationTest.testGetDestinationWithCustomExchange() fails

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-792) Need to revise QueueBrowser implementation strategy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13217880#comment-13217880 ] Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-792: --- Thanks for the comments guys. Let me move

Address validation Queues vs Topics

As per the discussion on QPID-792, I'm moving the discussion onto the dev list under. I have attempted to summarise the current behaviour and some of the comments expressed by Rob and Robbie. Currently the clients (C++, python and JMS) resolves an address (with the 0-10 protocol) as follows. 1.

Re: Address validation Queues vs Topics

If the queue and topic qualifiers are used then I guess it makes it really easy for us to work out the validation. What are we going to do with the destination qualifier ? Ex destination.my-dest=address-string 1. We deprecate this and get qpid users to use one of queue or topic as the