Re: AMQP broker connection with multiple certificates

2012-06-18 Thread Gordon Sim
On 06/16/2012 06:56 PM, Qpid_user wrote: Hi, I have a requirement whereby I need to connect to the same AMQP broker, however with different certificate aliases as each client uses different certificate. As ssl_cert_alias has to be specified in the connection string, does this mean that it is

Re: 0.18 release update - upcoming dates

2012-06-18 Thread Rob Godfrey
Hi Justin, on the Java Broker we're doing a fair amount of work on a new web-based management console which we want to have in for 0.18. We're currently doing this work on a branch that's tracking trunk. We *could* merge this to trunk now, but we prefer only to merge work which is fully

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3914) SSL Client Authentication support for the Windows C++ client

2012-06-18 Thread Michal Zerola (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13395823#comment-13395823 ] Michal Zerola commented on QPID-3914: - OK. Which modification do you prefer then: -

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3914) SSL Client Authentication support for the Windows C++ client

2012-06-18 Thread Andrew Stitcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13395885#comment-13395885 ] Andrew Stitcher commented on QPID-3914: --- I don't think you've explained why you need

Reviewboard appears to be back

2012-06-18 Thread Andrew Stitcher
So code reviews can continue as before. Andrew - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3914) SSL Client Authentication support for the Windows C++ client

2012-06-18 Thread Michal Zerola (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13395898#comment-13395898 ] Michal Zerola commented on QPID-3914: - One of the reason of extending the client for

[Java] Qpid API over the C++ client

2012-06-18 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Hi All, I've been working on providing a Java version of the Qpid API (QPID-4001) For starters I have experimented on implementing this API over the existing C++ client via SWIG/JNI until we get a pure Java implementation based on Rob Godfrey's proton-j work. There are some unique benefits

Re: 0.18 release update - upcoming dates

2012-06-18 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Hi Justin, I would like to get the work I have done on the Qpid Java API implementation over the c++ client into trunk for the 0.18 release. This is a completely independent piece and would like to include as an experimental feature for the 0.18 release. I'm putting up the pieces for review as

Re: [Java] Qpid API over the C++ client

2012-06-18 Thread Rob Godfrey
Hi Rajith, I know you've been working on getting a JMS client over messaging API working, but this is the first I realized that the intention was to add *another* Java client for 0.18. the goal of JMS on top of messaging on top of proton makes a lot of sense... I'm less convinced that JMS on top

Re: [Java] Qpid API over the C++ client

2012-06-18 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Rob, Let me clarify a few points. Perhaps my initial message wasn't clear. (*) At this point there is no plan to add a JMS layer for 0.18 (*) The JMS layer would be a generic implementation over the messaging API, and independent of any API implementation. (*) When we do add a JMS layer

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-686) requeue and release should make messages available atomically

2012-06-18 Thread Gordon Sim (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gordon Sim resolved QPID-686. - Resolution: Won't Fix requeue and release should make messages available atomically

Re: [Java] Qpid API over the C++ client

2012-06-18 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Rob, I agree with your plan! All though the work is independent and doesn't effect existing code, it's indeed going to be a basis for future work and we want to get it right. So I will continue with the review process, but will not land the code until everybody gets a chance to have a look at the

Re: 0.18 release update - upcoming dates

2012-06-18 Thread Justin Ross
Hi, Steve. Reading QPID-3914, it seems there are some questions about the patches' readiness. Do you think it's ready for inclusion? (If so, please indicate in the jira's comments so point and counterpoint are in one place.) As to timing in general, I'd be willing to accept a patch for

Re: 0.18 release update - upcoming dates

2012-06-18 Thread Justin Ross
Hi, Rob. I don't have any objections. Since I feel better if I ask at least one question: does the console branch contain any important changes to the broker model or its operation? If not, I consider it safe to include up to beta. Justin On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Rob Godfrey wrote: Hi

Re: 0.18 release update - upcoming dates

2012-06-18 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Justin, As agreed on the other thread, I agree with Rob that it's better to hold on to the work I'm doing until we get more discussion/review. Most of my work (barring the C++/JNI code) are going to be used for the future client work and it's best we take more time to settle that down. Since we

Re: 0.18 release update - upcoming dates

2012-06-18 Thread Rob Godfrey
On 18 June 2012 19:34, Justin Ross jr...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, Rob.  I don't have any objections.  Since I feel better if I ask at least one question: does the console branch contain any important changes to the broker model or its operation?  If not, I consider it safe to include up to beta.

[jira] [Created] (QPID-4072) HA use backup messages in failover.

2012-06-18 Thread Alan Conway (JIRA)
Alan Conway created QPID-4072: - Summary: HA use backup messages in failover. Key: QPID-4072 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4072 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Bug