Rob Godfrey created QPID-4195:
-
Summary: Add AMQP 1.0 JMS client to release script
Key: QPID-4195
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4195
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Godfrey resolved QPID-4195.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Add AMQP 1.0 JMS client to release script
Can I request QPID-4195 - a change to the release.sh script to include
the AMQP 1.0 JMS client? I know you (Robbie) have reviewed this
already. Should be very low risk, and it will allow the people who
are looking for a JMS client for AMQP 1.0 to get one :-)
-- Rob
On 3 August 2012 12:26,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13430287#comment-13430287
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-4191:
--
I have reviewed the change and would support its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13430342#comment-13430342
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-4195:
--
Reviewed (by me), approved for 0.18.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13430343#comment-13430343
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-4191:
--
Reviewed by Gordon, approved for 0.18.
Approved for inclusion.
Robbie
On 7 August 2012 09:50, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I request QPID-4195 - a change to the release.sh script to include
the AMQP 1.0 JMS client? I know you (Robbie) have reviewed this
already. Should be very low risk, and it will allow the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13430348#comment-13430348
]
Pavel Moravec commented on QPID-4177:
-
Preliminary patch that does not resolve adjacent
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302/#review9957
---
On Aug. 7, 2012, 1:37 p.m., Kenneth Giusti wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/include/proton/driver.h,
line 192
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302/diff/1-2/?file=132726#file132726line192
Minor artistic flourish - how about we change this api to
I'd like to include in 0.18:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4191 : HA removing self
address breaks if a VIP is used.
Its a very serious bug (prevents users from using VIPs which is what we
recommend they do) and the fix is fairly simple.
Cheers,
Alan.
Approved for inclusion (before you sent the email :P)
Robbie
On 7 August 2012 14:54, Alan Conway acon...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like to include in 0.18:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4191 : HA removing self
address breaks if a VIP is used.
Its a very serious bug (prevents
0.18 request
QPID-4194
Very low risk 2-line change to Cluster.cpp, to enable queue events in
CATCHUP mode.
Otherwise a clustered broker, if it is a newbie that is in CATCHUP mode,
and if it gets a message, and if there is a replication queue from this
broker to somewhere else -- the newbie
If someone familiar with the cluster code can review it first then I will
consider it for inclusion.
Robbie.
On 7 Aug 2012 15:22, mick mgoul...@redhat.com wrote:
0.18 request
QPID-4194
Very low risk 2-line change to Cluster.cpp, to enable queue events in
CATCHUP mode.
Otherwise a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302/#review9964
---
I think this is pretty much what I was thinking. I don't really like
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 15:36 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
If someone familiar with the cluster code can review it first then I
will consider it for inclusion.
I reviewed and agree it is suitable for inclusion in 0.18. I'll put a
comment on the JIRA as soon as JIRA is up and running againn.
Darryl L. Pierce created QPID-4196:
--
Summary: Provides %contract assurances in the swig layer for
language bindings.
Key: QPID-4196
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4196
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Darryl L. Pierce updated QPID-4196:
---
Attachment: 0001-Provides-contract-guarantees-to-language-bindings.patch
Provides
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6396/#review9965
---
Where is the assignment is done outside of the lock in the old code?
Thanks Alan. Consider it approved Mick.
Robbie
On 7 August 2012 17:29, Alan Conway acon...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 15:36 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
If someone familiar with the cluster code can review it first then I
will consider it for inclusion.
I reviewed and agree
On Aug. 7, 2012, 1:37 p.m., Kenneth Giusti wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/include/proton/driver.h,
line 192
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302/diff/1-2/?file=132726#file132726line192
Minor artistic flourish - how about we change this api to
On Aug. 7, 2012, 3:58 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I think this is pretty much what I was thinking. I don't really like the
actual client file doing the #include winsock2 but in the circumstances
it's better than the previous alternative.
Another possibility is to move the
On Aug. 7, 2012, 1:37 p.m., Kenneth Giusti wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/include/proton/driver.h,
line 192
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6302/diff/1-2/?file=132726#file132726line192
Minor artistic flourish - how about we change this api to
On Aug. 7, 2012, 3:58 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I think this is pretty much what I was thinking. I don't really like the
actual client file doing the #include winsock2 but in the circumstances
it's better than the previous alternative.
Another possibility is to move the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Conway resolved QPID-4191.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to 0.18 r1370308
HA removing self address breaks if a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13430452#comment-13430452
]
Alan Conway commented on QPID-4194:
---
Change looks correct very low risk, it is suitable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Darryl L. Pierce updated QPID-4192:
---
Attachment: (was: 0001-New-Perl-language-bindings-for-Qpid.patch)
Provide a Perl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Darryl L. Pierce updated QPID-4192:
---
Attachment: (was:
0002-Updated-all-Perl-examples-to-work-with-the-new-Perl-.patch)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Darryl L. Pierce updated QPID-4192:
---
Attachment: 0002-Updated-all-Perl-examples-to-work-with-the-new-Perl-.patch
On Aug. 7, 2012, 4:51 p.m., Alan Conway wrote:
Where is the assignment is done outside of the lock in the old code? The
assignment in notifyConnection seems to have the same locking in both old
and new code.
You're correct, the call to link::established() still happens outside the lock
On Aug. 7, 2012, 4:51 p.m., Alan Conway wrote:
Where is the assignment is done outside of the lock in the old code? The
assignment in notifyConnection seems to have the same locking in both old
and new code.
Kenneth Giusti wrote:
You're correct, the call to link::established()
On Aug. 7, 2012, 4:51 p.m., Alan Conway wrote:
Where is the assignment is done outside of the lock in the old code? The
assignment in notifyConnection seems to have the same locking in both old
and new code.
Kenneth Giusti wrote:
You're correct, the call to link::established()
On Aug. 7, 2012, 4:51 p.m., Alan Conway wrote:
Where is the assignment is done outside of the lock in the old code? The
assignment in notifyConnection seems to have the same locking in both old
and new code.
Kenneth Giusti wrote:
You're correct, the call to link::established()
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6396/#review9991
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alan Conway
On Aug. 6, 2012, 5:51 p.m.,
34 matches
Mail list logo