>
> From what I understood, the primary reason Danushka is looking to have a
> virtual host per tenant is for access control.
> Is that correct ?
>
Plus object distinction.
For an example, users in different tenants should be able to create a
destination with the same name but they should have di
t; > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 29 March 2011 06:10, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> > >> danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Robbie,
> > >> >
> > >> > I hope you are in a
nd goal for
> doing
> >> this would really be?
> >>
> >> Robbie
> >>
> >>
> >> On 29 March 2011 06:10, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> >> danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Robbie,
> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Danushka
>> >
>> >
>> > -- Forwarded message --
>> > From: Danushka Menikkumbura
>> > Date: Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:47 AM
>> > Subject: Re: Creating vhosts dynamically in Java broker
&g
orwarded message --
> > From: Danushka Menikkumbura
> > Date: Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:47 AM
> > Subject: Re: Creating vhosts dynamically in Java broker
> > To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any feedback on this is
On 28 March 2011 22:17, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any feedback on this is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Danushka
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can I create virtua
2011 at 2:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Creating vhosts dynamically in Java broker
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Any feedback on this is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Danushka
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikku
Hi,
Any feedback on this is appreciated.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I create virtual hosts dynamically in the Java broker?.
> ApplicationRegistry.createVirtualHost would do?.
>
> Thanks,
> Danus
Hi,
Can I create virtual hosts dynamically in the Java broker?.
ApplicationRegistry.createVirtualHost would do?.
Thanks,
Danushka