On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 14:20 -0700, a fabbri wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:32 -0700, a fabbri wrote:
...
I've not tested, but I'd be very surprised.
IIRC, my strace of qpidd and client showed a ton of
cc:ing the list, as I think this may be interesting for others.
On 8/27/10 7:18 AM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 16:13 -0700, aafabbri wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Just curious if you observed any performance gains from your commit (below).
Chances are you haven't
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:32 -0700, a fabbri wrote:
...
I've not tested, but I'd be very surprised.
IIRC, my strace of qpidd and client showed a ton of setsigprocmask()
syscalls. These are not cheap. I haven't retested with this new code
yet, but I'll be happy to see those useless (in
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:32 -0700, a fabbri wrote:
...
I've not tested, but I'd be very surprised.
IIRC, my strace of qpidd and client showed a ton of setsigprocmask()
syscalls. These are not cheap. I haven't
