Re: Website Markdown question

2013-07-18 Thread Justin Ross
Ted, thanks for finding this. I've now made underscores work as expected, and I've added the needed stylesheet rules for blockquotes. On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote: After further investigation, I see that _underscore_ is not rendered into html, however

Re: Website Markdown question

2013-07-18 Thread Alan Conway
On 07/17/2013 04:07 PM, Justin Ross wrote: I think I know what causes this, so I figure can make the underscores behave as expected. I'll tell you what I find. Is there/can we add a pointer on the site to the version of markdown syntax used?

Re: Website Markdown question

2013-07-18 Thread Justin Ross
Yes, the de facto standard is linked from the Markdown syntax section of the readme: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/site/README - http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax I'll add a link to the implementation as well so you can find out precisely what it's doing. Justin On

Re: Website Markdown question

2013-07-17 Thread Ted Ross
After further investigation, I see that _underscore_ is not rendered into html, however *asterisks* are. On the other hand, block quotes are rendered into html so this is probably a style-sheet problem because block quotes don't look any different than normal paragraphs. -Ted On 07/17/2013