On 05/03/2011 02:37 PM, Mike Pomraning wrote:
This message[0] seems to confirm that persistent ring queues break hard when
they reach capacity, rather than wrapping gracefully. Further, that
breaking point is rather difficult to compute in advance.
Is there a practicable workaround for those
This message[0] seems to confirm that persistent ring queues break hard when
they reach capacity, rather than wrapping gracefully. Further, that
breaking point is rather difficult to compute in advance.
Is there a practicable workaround for those who want persistent storage and
a ring limit
