On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Paul,
Thank you very much for your kind comments about Qpid and your desire to
contribute towards the project.
Perhaps it's best to create a separate JIRA for the PHP client.
Will do :)
I am sorry if you are
On 01/26/2011 03:30 AM, Paul Colby wrote:
First of all, let me just say that I'm really impressed with Qpid!
I've been playing with the C++ broker and client library on and off
for the past couple of weeks, and I've been continually impressed with
just how well it works out of the box. So thank
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Kennedy resolved QPID-3010.
--
Resolution: Fixed
broker uses the MINA PooledByteBufferAllocator instead of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Kennedy resolved QPID-2902.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.9
LargeMessageTest fails on java.0.10 test profiles
Excellent. Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3009
for a similar contribution (for Perl) that was recently submitted.
-Ted
On 01/26/2011 04:43 AM, Paul Colby wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Rajith Attapatturajit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Paul,
Thank you very much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-3021:
-
Component/s: Java Broker
Description: When addressing QPID-3014 it was noticed
status logging tests are disabled and/or failing on Java 0-10 test profile
--
Key: QPID-3022
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3022
Project: Qpid
Issue
logging tests unnecessarily use an InternalBrokerBaseCase to load configuration
for test comparison
---
Key: QPID-3023
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Kennedy resolved QPID-3020.
--
Resolution: Fixed
an inbalance in use of the CurrentActor stack holds 0-10 subscriptions in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross updated QPID-3009:
---
Attachment: QPID-3009-Make.diff
Here is a cut at the autoconf/automake support for building this binding.
On 01/24/2011 08:30 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 01/21/2011 07:18 PM, Jonathan Robie wrote:
I think I'd like to be able to declare the objects we currently support
directly. That includes AMQP 0-10 and the Qpid extensions.
I'd rather not have a declaration mix constructs from two different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross updated QPID-3009:
---
Attachment: (was: QPID-3009-Make.diff)
Perl binding to Qpid messaging
--
On 01/26/2011 02:34 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
So it seems like we have an open ended collection of concrete type
systems here:
amqp0-10
amqp1-0
amqpx-y
(stomp or whatever future protocols we support)
And we have a generic type system with 2 types (so far):
topic(=exchage) and queue. These are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987242#action_12987242
]
Ted Ross commented on QPID-3009:
I have a comment that pertains to the structure of these
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12987252#action_12987252
]
Ted Ross commented on QPID-3009:
While I'm on the subject...
These bindings should also
15 matches
Mail list logo
