0-8/0-10 report failure to reconnect after failover with different exception
Key: QPID-3349
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3349
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-3349:
-
Component/s: Java Tests
Java Client
Assignee: Keith Wall
0-8/0-10 report failure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-3133:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: Replacement Jira.)
Failover tests do not pass on 0-10 profiles
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061864#comment-13061864
]
Keith Wall commented on QPID-3133:
--
Ok, Thanks Rajith.
Failover tests do not pass on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13061911#comment-13061911
]
Kim van der Riet commented on QPID-3348:
The special meta keyword args _timeout and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall reassigned QPID-3345:
Assignee: Keith Wall
Make new transport implementations pluggable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kim van der Riet resolved QPID-3348.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in r.1144302
Qmf broker proxy method create() does not handle
On Jul 5, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Keith Wall wrote:
Hi Rajith
1. Coverage
We currently have close to 1200+ test cases and my impression is that we
still have quite a few gaps. All though it's painful maybe we should try to
get an inventory of our existing test cases.
I have started work on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kim van der Riet updated QPID-3350:
---
Description:
Several (but not all) the federation tests leak connection objects. This causes
Python federation tests (federation.FederationTests.*) leak connections
---
Key: QPID-3350
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3350
Project: Qpid
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ken Giusti updated QPID-3350:
-
Affects Version/s: 0.12
Fix Version/s: 0.14
Python federation tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kim van der Riet updated QPID-3348:
---
Affects Version/s: 0.13
Fix Version/s: 0.14
Qmf broker proxy method create() does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kim van der Riet updated QPID-3309:
---
Affects Version/s: 0.13
Fix Version/s: 0.14
Management broker object port is not set
On 2011-07-07 16:28:47, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
This seems a bit horrible, deliberately leaving a session open and unused.
Were there really no alternative options?
On first glance I also don't imagine this works with the Java broker, which
would admittedly be the brokers fault but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13062229#comment-13062229
]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3269:
-
bq. On
On 2011-07-07 12:14:51, Gordon Sim wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/java/common/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/transport/Session.java,
line 1069
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1027/diff/1/?file=22094#file22094line1069
Could you not have used sync() here instead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13062232#comment-13062232
]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3269:
-
bq. On
17 matches
Mail list logo
