Hi,
I created a FreeBSD port of Qpid 0.10 but am stuck at the issue
described in #QPID-2549 [1]. Just to understand it completely - does
the JIRA mean Qpid is completely broken on FreeBSD or would it be
possible to navigate around the Poller related error messages by
specifying --without-poller wh
+1
-K
- Original Message -
> Howdy, all. The last-minute blocker, QPID-3394, has been fixed, and
> there
> are no open blocker jiras against 0.12. The proposed final RC, from
> revision 1154981 of the 0.12 release branch, is available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.12/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13083673#comment-13083673
]
Justin Ross commented on QPID-3111:
---
Is this issue fixed?
> DynamicQueueExchangeCreateTe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13083559#comment-13083559
]
Justin Ross commented on QPID-3066:
---
This looks like it may be resolved. True?
> UTF8Te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Ross updated QPID-3061:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.11)
Future
> Discrepancies between CMake and Automake
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Ross updated QPID-2993:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.11)
Future
> Federated source-local links crash remotely f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13083552#comment-13083552
]
Justin Ross commented on QPID-2316:
---
Can we declare this issue resolved?
> 0.6RC2 C++ Bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Ross updated QPID-2057:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.11)
Future
> qpidd --require-encryption forces SASL securi
+1
Nuno
On 08/09/2011 03:35 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
Howdy, all. The last-minute blocker, QPID-3394, has been fixed, and
there are no open blocker jiras against 0.12. The proposed final RC,
from revision 1154981 of the 0.12 release branch, is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid
+1
On 08/09/2011 03:35 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
Howdy, all. The last-minute blocker, QPID-3394, has been fixed, and
there are no open blocker jiras against 0.12. The proposed final RC,
from revision 1154981 of the 0.12 release branch, is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:10 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
> http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/net/ipv6_guide/index.html
>
> Which claims: "With Java you can run any Java applications, client or
> server, on an IPv6-enabled platform using J2SE 1.4 or later, and that
> application will
While Qpid 0.12 is still hanging out for a few more votes, I thought I'd
send out a pointer to our 0.14 release page.
https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/014-release.html
There's not much there yet apart from the proposed schedule. Over time
this page will host more content.
0.14 itself has bee
On 08/11/2011 06:40 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:27 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:08 -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
...
1. Actually listening/connecting to IPv6 sockets (including the correct
reconnect and multiple listening socket logic)
My un
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:08 -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> ...
> > 1. Actually listening/connecting to IPv6 sockets (including the correct
> > reconnect and multiple listening socket logic)
>
> My understanding is that since Java 1.4, there have been support for IPv6.
> AFAIK this is transparent
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:27 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:08 -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> > ...
> > > 1. Actually listening/connecting to IPv6 sockets (including the correct
> > > reconnect and multiple listening socket logic)
> >
> > My understanding is that since J
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> I've been spending much of my time in the past few weeks getting support
> for IPv6 in to the C++ and python code bases, and I expect to get it in
> the code base in the next few days (unless someone can see a problem not
> yet noticed wit
I've been spending much of my time in the past few weeks getting support
for IPv6 in to the C++ and python code bases, and I expect to get it in
the code base in the next few days (unless someone can see a problem not
yet noticed with the code).
I've created an umbrella Jira - QPID-3404 to track I
+1
On 10 August 2011 20:00, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> +1
>
> I have staged the Maven artifacts for the Java client on the ASF Nexus
> instance and tested them, they can be promoted upon distribution of
> the release (which as previously should not include the maven
> directory output by the relea
CRAM-MD5-HASHED not supported by 0-10 protocol (+ no suppport for custom SASL
mechanisms).
--
Key: QPID-3415
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3415
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13083113#comment-13083113
]
Keith Wall commented on QPID-3415:
--
I'll submit a patch to change the 0-10 code path to us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim resolved QPID-3412.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.13
> Python and C++ clients use link name option differently
>
On 08/11/2011 01:49 PM, mgoul...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mgoulish
Date: Thu Aug 11 12:49:39 2011
New Revision: 1156604
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1156604&view=rev
Log:
two new management properties for connections: the sasl mechanism, and the
ssf (security strength factor).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13083089#comment-13083089
]
Danushka Menikkumbura commented on QPID-3414:
-
Hi Keith,
I strongly believe th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keith Wall updated QPID-3414:
-
Description:
The current PluginManager implementation knows a hardcode list of classes to
export as OSGi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim updated QPID-3412:
-
Summary: Python and C++ clients use link name option differently (was:
Python and C++ clients translate a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13083082#comment-13083082
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-3412:
--
To illustrate the point in previous comment, consider
Plugin Manager Improvements
---
Key: QPID-3414
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3414
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java Broker
Reporter: Keith Wall
Plugin Manager Improvements
---
Key: QPID-3413
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3413
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java Broker
Reporter: Keith Wall
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim reassigned QPID-3412:
Assignee: Gordon Sim
> Python and C++ clients translate address differently
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13083056#comment-13083056
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-3412:
--
"response/response.hey_Joe" is *not* translated to "re
Python and C++ clients translate address differently
Key: QPID-3412
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3412
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: C++ Client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13083044#comment-13083044
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-3403:
--
That's a good suggestion; I've added that test in.
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1440/#review1407
---
Ship it!
- Gordon
On 2011-08-11 05:36:00, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
