[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13274260#comment-13274260
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-3994:
--
The commit in r1337829
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13274262#comment-13274262
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-3971:
--
The commit in r1337829
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13274272#comment-13274272
]
Weston M. Price commented on QPID-3971:
---
Thanks for the improvements Robbie. Sort of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Weston M. Price closed QPID-3971.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with patch and improvements from Robbie.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13274278#comment-13274278
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-3971:
--
I only noticed it fail originally because of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13274279#comment-13274279
]
Weston M. Price commented on QPID-3971:
---
Probably a difference in the way different
One thing I did notice, once this change went in, a few of the java projects,
client especially, don't seem to see the updated dependency location in the
Eclipse .classpath files. The common project seems ok, but client does not.
Regards,
Weston
On May 7, 2012, at 8:33 AM, Weston M. Price
My bad, it appears there is a flag in common.xml that controls whether or not
to update the files. Not sure why it worked for common and not for client, but
flipping that flag and running the task again produced the correct results.
Regards,
Weston
On May 13, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Weston M.
Do you mean ones you created ' yourself ', or ones generated with the
Ant Eclipse target Keith added to the build?
Either way, I should have actually thought to email about this, oops.
In order to allow Ivy to fully manage the contents of the directory
itself (letting it clean up whenever we
On May 13, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Do you mean ones you created ' yourself ', or ones generated with the
Ant Eclipse target Keith added to the build?
The Ant Eclipse target.
Either way, I should have actually thought to email about this, oops.
In order to allow Ivy to
Also, the Ant Eclipse task does not take into account the classes generated and
built as part of the whole process. These usually end up in
build/scratch/project-name. Might be useful to see if we can somehow add this
as part of the task so we don't have to manually go back and set it up.
W
That would explain it; if it is checking that the modules build.xml
file is newer than the Eclipse project files then only the common
module would have prompted such a regeneration because its the only
module level build.xml file that got updated by the Ivy related
changes(that I can recall).
On
On 13 May 2012 16:08, Weston M. Price wpr...@redhat.com wrote:
On May 13, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Do you mean ones you created ' yourself ', or ones generated with the
Ant Eclipse target Keith added to the build?
The Ant Eclipse target.
Either way, I should have actually
I rarely use Eclipse, and one of the reasons is the work that's required to
setup everything to conform to the Apache code conventions. I have tried a few
times, but I can never actually seem to get it just right. Does someone on the
project have an example of the Eclipse cleanup, formatter
Keith wanted to add that but Ant Eclipse didnt support generating
those types of entries in the project files, theres some commentry
around that in the targets.
Robbie
On 13 May 2012 16:11, Weston M. Price wpr...@redhat.com wrote:
Also, the Ant Eclipse task does not take into account the
On May 13, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
On 13 May 2012 16:08, Weston M. Price wpr...@redhat.com wrote:
On May 13, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Do you mean ones you created ' yourself ', or ones generated with the
Ant Eclipse target Keith added to the build?
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13274310#comment-13274310
]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3990:
-
17 matches
Mail list logo
