On 07/13/2011 07:15 PM, Chuck Rolke wrote:
There already IS a top level README.txt. An edit on that file will go nicely
with the deletion of component directories. Remember to edit the LICENSE and
NOTICE files, too.
Done.
-
On 07/12/2011 01:47 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 07/12/2011 12:18 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Given that we voted to stop releasing standalone artifacts for the
pure ruby client with the last release, is there any reason to keep it
in the repository?
I noticed that the first thing that happened with
On 07/13/2011 08:20 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
Going once, going twice... I'll delete these directories tomorrow AM
unless I hear objections. I'll do so on both the 0.12 release branch
and on trunk.
My only suggestion would be to delete everything in the directories
except the top level directory
On 07/13/2011 04:39 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 07/13/2011 08:20 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
Going once, going twice... I'll delete these directories tomorrow AM
unless I hear objections. I'll do so on both the 0.12 release branch
and on trunk.
My only suggestion would be to delete everything in
On 07/13/2011 11:53 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 07/13/2011 04:39 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 07/13/2011 08:20 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
Going once, going twice... I'll delete these directories tomorrow AM
unless I hear objections. I'll do so on both the 0.12 release branch
and on trunk.
My only
On 07/13/2011 06:16 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
How about a top level readme with a where everything is.
Yes, a top level README is reasonable.
I think this is particularly important given the swig bindings as they
are not that easy to find unless you know what you are looking for.
I agree
On 07/13/2011 01:59 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
How about a top level readme with a where everything is.
Yes, a top level README is reasonable.
ack, this is a better than my first idea.
I think this is particularly important given the swig bindings as they
are not that easy to find unless you
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:47:07PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
I'm happy to delete this and the dotnet directory. Any objections to that?
+1
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
