I've mocked up nightly release pages in a way I hope is similar to how
you envisioned it. I like how it turns out.
http://people.apache.org/~jross/transom/head/releases/index.html#nightly-releases
http://people.apache.org/~jross/transom/head/releases/qpid-nightly/index.html
On 25 May 2013 14:22, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I've mocked up nightly release pages in a way I hope is similar to how
you envisioned it. I like how it turns out.
http://people.apache.org/~jross/transom/head/releases/index.html#nightly-releases
Some of the issues you raise will be addressed in an upcoming update
mail, so I won't address them here.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Robbie Gemmell
robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it was Jakub who previously mentioned the lack of links to trunk
documentation. I too find their
On 24 May 2013 13:30, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of the issues you raise will be addressed in an upcoming update
mail, so I won't address them here.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Robbie Gemmell
robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote:
[.. snip ..]
I had a quick look at the
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Rob Godfrey Sort of. In general,
for release content, there's a special
generation step. That's really a per-release task, however, not
something that many developers would typically do. The idea is that
the release manager would do the generation with each
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Rob Godfrey Sort of. In general,
for release content, there's a special
generation step. That's really a per-release task, however, not
something that many developers would
That's something I have looked at a little. I intend to do a deeper
investigation after 0.22 and the big site update.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at
On 24 May 2013 12:30, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of the issues you raise will be addressed in an upcoming update
mail, so I won't address them here.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Robbie Gemmell
robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it was Jakub who previously
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Robbie Gemmell
robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote:
Part of me think that if we had a page that looked a bit bare then maybe we
would be better about putting more stuff on it when people see it and
wonder where the missing bits are. Hiding it away where people won't
On 05/10/2013 12:39 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
Update:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/transom/2013-05-10/
Perhaps a Documentation link under Resources on the front page, leading to a
list of all the docs?
C++ Broker page: High Availability links to C++ broker book, suggest a link to
the
Hi Justin,
I have been preparing this email bit by bit for several days, here it
finally is...sorry it's a bit long now :)
I took another look and the site continues to improve, good work!
I think it was Jakub who previously mentioned the lack of links to trunk
documentation. I too find their
Having been the person progressing the last Great Logo Discussion, I knew
too well how they can proceed and I didn't wan't to see it get in the way
of the far more important discussion about the website content.
If we are getting ready to publish it though then I guess it is time to
have that
Update:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/transom/2013-05-10/
Previous versions:
http://people.apache.org/~jross/transom/2013-04-16/
http://people.apache.org/~jross/transom/2013-04-03/
http://people.apache.org/~jross/transom/2013-03-26/
it's cool, but don't remember discussing a change - it's
probably me, but just asking.
Thanks,
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Justin Ross [mailto:jr...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 12:39 PM
To: us...@qpid.apache.org; dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Website update 4
Update
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 18:20 +, Steve Huston wrote:
Looks very nice, Justin!
I don't see a link or description of qpidcomponents.org - since that's where
users can get the Linux store, I think that's important. Maybe off the
Downloads page like now?
As of 0.22 The store is in the main
discussing a change - it's
probably me, but just asking.
Thanks,
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Justin Ross [mailto:jr...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 12:39 PM
To: us...@qpid.apache.org; dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Website update 4
Update:
http://people.apache.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
