Github user zuyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/103
@tarunbansal To clarify, I mean to dump the flaky tuples `at the end` of
query execution, either to `stdout` or a new file.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user cramja commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/109
@hbdeshmukh I updated for TPCH in the PR header
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Hey 2 questions about TPCH sf100.
(1)
On a cloud lab box, I am having trouble getting query 17 to finish. It
seems to be stuck in Hash table operations. Any ideas/experience?
(2)
Anyone got the link to the spreadsheet with benchmark results?
-Marc
Github user cramja commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/109
Thanks @hakanmemisoglu I tried something similar to what you were
suggesting and the "works but I don't know why" solution I found was to declare
the variables inside the lambda. It's
Github user cramja commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/109
@hbdeshmukh 2x improvement was for the contrived test of trying to insert a
whole bunch of tuples into a Splitrow at once as in PR100. As for TPCH, I'm not
sure, other than that this is
Github user navsan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/109
This bug was filed and fixed a year ago in 5.3, I think. It had been around
for 2-3 years, so weâll probably be affected in older versions of GCC too.
Github user hakanmemisoglu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/109
Hi @cramja, the problem might be related lambda capture arguments. GCC 5
was giving the same problems if you use general capture by reference [&]. You
can try to give specific
GitHub user cramja opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/109
Refectored bulk insertion to the SplitRow store
The inner loop of the insert algorithm has been changed to reduce function
calls to only those that are absolutely necessary. Also, we
Github user cramja closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/100
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/106
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user hbdeshmukh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/106
Looks good, merging. Thanks @jianqiao for the feature.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user hbdeshmukh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/108
Remove unnecessary code from FastSeparateChainingHashTable::resize()
- In resize, all the values are moved from original hash table are
copied to the new hash table using
GitHub user hbdeshmukh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/107
Fix memory leak in FastSeparateChaining hash table
- Destruction of payload in hash table.
- Separate phases of payload destruction of aggregation hash tables.
- First the
Github user hbdeshmukh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/106
Hi @jianqiao
I have a dataset on which \analyze was ran already. Do I need to reload the
data for the changes in this PR to be effective?
---
If your project is set up
14 matches
Mail list logo
