On Aug 12, Eli Barzilay wrote:
** The addition is *slow*. Very slow. I wrote a test program to sum
up the integers from 0 to 200 -- and I get these numbers (test
code attached below):
I forgot the attachment.
x.rkt
Description: Binary data
--
((lambda (x) (x x))
On Aug 13, Noel Welsh wrote:
I think this is incorrect. I read:
- When we provide APIs we lock ourselves into them
- The proposed sequence API is slow and can't be sped up without
significant effort (cf worldwide shortage of Matthew-Flatt-hours)
- We shouldn't lock ourselves into a slow
On Aug 12, Jay McCarthy wrote:
[...] Of the additions I made, I believe that only seqn-cons,
seqn-rest, seqn-tail, seqn-append, seqn-map, seqn-filter, and
seqn-add-between will have the speed problem.
Side note: I read these as seq n this, seq n that, ... -- at least
to me, seqn works pretty
I changed the name in libracket.vcproj.
At Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:58:22 +1000, Paul Steckler wrote:
In last night's build, the Visual Studio solution file
src/worksp/racket/racket.sln contains the line:
Project({8BC9CEB8-8B4A-11D0-8D11-00A0C91BC942}) = libracket,
Matthew also made this work with the older GTK-related libraries on
Debian Stable. So if you tried before and were thwarted, it works now.
(Thanks, Matthew.)
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
I happened upon the Racket wikipedia page again, and yet again the Hello
World section made me want to cry. So I deleted it, and replaced it with the
straightforward version of racket's Hello, World! program, viz.:
#lang racket
Hello, World!
...then I added the sierpinski example from the
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:51 PM, John Clements
cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote:
...then I added the sierpinski example from the racket-lang front page. I'm
hoping that whoever wrote this code will either not object, or change it.
I wrote an early version of it and certainly don't object or
7 matches
Mail list logo
