I'm trying to follow the PLT git instructions located here,
http://git.racket-lang.org/intro.html
It says that you should get back information about your permissions
when you connect to the gitolite server like so,
ssh g...@git.racket-lang.org
But this is what happens when I try,
ssh
I think those instructions are for committeerrss. You will probably
have a better experience overall if you go with the github mirror:
http://github.com/plt/racket
To clone this just issue
git clone http://github.com/plt/racket.git
HTH,
N.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Horace Dynamite
On 12 October 2010 13:14, Noel Welsh noelwe...@gmail.com wrote:
I think those instructions are for committeerrss. You will probably
have a better experience overall if you go with the github mirror:
Thanks Noel.
This is what I ended up doing.
Horace.
We already have begin-with-definitions. Would there be a great penalty to
simply wrap every body-like sequence of expressions and definitions with
begin-with-definitions? The latter even allows more freedom than (let () def
... expr ...), for it allows (begin-with-definitions def-or-expr ...). I
An hour ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:38:58 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:15:09 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
I'd love to see an implicit `#%begin', which could have the
above apply in more places automatically. (It was one of the
feature
Three minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:43:03 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
An hour ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:38:58 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:15:09 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
I'd love to see an implicit `#%begin',
At Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:16:35 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Three minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:43:03 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
An hour ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:38:58 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:15:09 -0400, Eli
A while ago I thought up an alternate syntax that converts directly into
S-Exp in an effort to reduce the number of parenthesis, hopefully
simplify the way a program looked, and still be completely compatible
(including macros) with the current Racket API. To test out my solution
I've been
The old error was a problem with inline assembly that would show up
when gcc optimization is disabled. (Why was -O2 disabled for your
build?) I fixed that problem a few days ago, though I didn't make the
connection to your earlier post.
The new error looks like a mismatch in the way that files
9 matches
Mail list logo