I think we should put in a list shuffler into the core.
Which should we use? The faster one?
Jay
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
5 minutes ago, Neil Toronto wrote:
Carl Eastlund wrote:
It's pick a random, uniform ordering, and then sort based on it.
I think we want the one recommended by the statisticians. :)
Robby
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should put in a list shuffler into the core.
Which should we use? The faster one?
Jay
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Eli Barzilay
Any objections to `shuffle' in `racket/list'?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
Not by me.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Any objections to `shuffle' in `racket/list'?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
4 matches
Mail list logo