If we take it out of editor%, we should not encounter any problems
whatsoever. It is possible that additional implements-interface checks will
succeed, but I am doubtful. Other than that I can't think of any problems.
Should Asumu try and just run the whole test suite and if it works you
Sounds fine.
At Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:20:54 -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
If we take it out of editor%, we should not encounter any problems
whatsoever. It is possible that additional implements-interface checks will
succeed, but I am doubtful. Other than that I can't think of any
I've just committed the culmination of this thread.
I've removed the coercive contracts and replaced them with a global
imperative any-response hook that defaults to off but can easily be
turned on to support X-exprs or the old behavior of the Web Server.
Jay
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 5:55 PM,
Thanks, Jay.
Robby
On Tuesday, December 7, 2010, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just committed the culmination of this thread.
I've removed the coercive contracts and replaced them with a global
imperative any-response hook that defaults to off but can easily be turned
on
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
I've removed the coercive contracts and replaced them with a global
imperative any-response hook that defaults to off but can easily be
turned on to support X-exprs or the old behavior of the Web Server.
Great!
If you go to the racket page at github (https://github.com/plt/racket)
and hit the downloads button, you get a download with three ancient
versions. The reson for that is that it sorts the tags in reverse
lexicographic order. (The same holds for the switch tags dropdown
list.)
I've asked on
It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if someone
went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle of the list.
But I wouldn't want you to spend too much time on it.
Robby
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
If you go to the racket
6 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if someone
went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle of the
list.
OK, so I'll take it as a yes vote. Any suggestion for new names?
One option is to go with the common misconception of
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
6 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if someone
went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle of the
list.
OK, so I'll take it as a yes vote. Any
Four minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
6 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if someone
went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle of the
list.
On Dec 7, 2010, at 5:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
6 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if someone
went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle of the
list.
OK, so I'll take it as a yes vote. Any suggestion for new names?
Two minutes ago, John Clements wrote:
On Dec 7, 2010, at 5:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
6 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
It is a kind out of the way place but it would be a shame if
someone went there, esp. since the latest stuff is in the middle
of the list.
OK, so I'll take it
12 matches
Mail list logo
