Re: [racket-dev] Racktest was: OMG the thread that will never die about testing

2011-02-21 Thread Ryan Culpepper
On 02/20/2011 07:52 PM, Robby Findler wrote: On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Robby Findler wrote: On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: On 02/20/2011 06:43 PM, Robby Findler wrote: One thing I would also like to be able to do, based on this discussion, is make a rackunit/

Re: [racket-dev] define-wish and a call for assistance

2011-02-21 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > I'd prefer Kathy to supply docs asap instead. Kathy already committed docs, which answer all of my current questions. Thanks! sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _ For list-related administrative

Re: [racket-dev] define-wish and a call for assistance

2011-02-21 Thread Matthias Felleisen
I'd prefer Kathy to supply docs asap instead. (BTW she had a private email out on this call for help, and I got only a bit further in 15 mins of poking around. So perhaps someone could figure out how to help out with the multiple arity stuff.) On Feb 21, 2011, at 9:26 AM, Robby Findler wro

Re: [racket-dev] define-wish and a call for assistance

2011-02-21 Thread Robby Findler
Kathy: you can add this feature to a branch in your section of the repository if you expect others to look at it and give you feedback. Robby On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Kathryn Gray > wrote: >> I've added a preliminary version

Re: [racket-dev] define-wish and a call for assistance

2011-02-21 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Kathryn Gray wrote: > I've added a preliminary version of define-wish to the teaching languages > and the test-engine Can we please please please not have any new undocumented features added to the languages, *especially* the teaching languages? -- sam th sa...@

Re: [racket-dev] define-wish and a call for assistance

2011-02-21 Thread Kathryn Gray
On 21 Feb 2011, at 1:33:46, Stephen Bloch wrote: > On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Kathryn Gray wrote: > >> I've added a preliminary version of define-wish to the teaching languages >> and the test-engine but it doesn't presently do everything that was >> discussed/requested in the original conv

Re: [racket-dev] define-wish and a call for assistance

2011-02-21 Thread Stephen Bloch
On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Kathryn Gray wrote: > I've added a preliminary version of define-wish to the teaching languages and > the test-engine but it doesn't presently do everything that was > discussed/requested in the original conversation. And I don't know how to > extend it to support

[racket-dev] define-wish and a call for assistance

2011-02-21 Thread Kathryn Gray
Hello, I've added a preliminary version of define-wish to the teaching languages and the test-engine but it doesn't presently do everything that was discussed/requested in the original conversation. And I don't know how to extend it to support those features. So can someone with more experienc

Re: [racket-dev] Racktest was: OMG the thread that will never die about testing

2011-02-21 Thread Kathryn Gray
Climbing into this conversation late (Goodness, what a time for me to go out of sight of the internet...) so I haven't delved into all of the proposals and arguments that have been flowing around. I first want to point out (if it hasn't been discussed already) that the test-engine library was