On Mar 17, 2011, at 15:34 , Matthias Felleisen wrote:
I think we should stay away from 'stream' here.
If Racket had grown out of the Unix tradition, I'd
be fine with it. But we partially grew out the
functional community, and they use 'stream' for
a narrower concept.
Maybe a silly
A week ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:13:26 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Yesterday, Matthew Flatt wrote:
I see your point about generator, and so I agree that we
should use a different term. I'm not too happy with the term
producer, but I don't yet have a better
On Monday, John Clements wrote:
On Mar 21, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
We can do whatever is standard on whatever platform nowadays
thanks to gr2.
Well, that simplifies things; any objection to just adding
shift-command-S for Save Definitions As... to the Mac platform?
Is
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
On Monday, John Clements wrote:
On Mar 21, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
We can do whatever is standard on whatever platform nowadays
thanks to gr2.
Well, that simplifies things; any objection to just adding
30 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
On Monday, John Clements wrote:
Well, that simplifies things; any objection to just adding
shift-command-S for Save Definitions As... to the Mac platform?
Is there any reason
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid nad...@acm.org wrote:
Yes, those would help, though some of the syntax is off in the
examples (copy-struct instead of struct-copy -- and the chum one is
missing bruce as the struct-expr).
Yeah, I realized the errors after re-building the
Has anyone ever implemented alpha-equivalence for fully expanded
Racket programs? It seems like it might be useful for testing macros,
and I'd rather not duplicate effort if it's already been done.
Carl Eastlund
_
For list-related administrative
Not exactly, Check Syntax is looking at the binding information in the
syntax objects to connect bindings and bound occurrences. Carl wants
to compare two syntax objects.
2011/3/25 Jos Koot jos.k...@telefonica.net:
I suppose Check Syntax already does alpha conversion. Anyway it
distinguishes
8 matches
Mail list logo