At Wed, 6 Jul 2011 05:59:30 -0400, Guillaume Marceau wrote:
[3]There is a layout problem in my new documentation I need help with.
I
tried to abstract the common text between the documentation of the
different levels.
It's possible that the HtDP languages should be different
Calling All Racketeers!
Join us at RacketCon, 23 24 July 2011.
http://con.racket-lang.org/
The schedule for RacketCon is now available, and includes
presentations by key members of the Racket team, including Matthew
Flatt on the future of Racket and Matthias Felleisen on the Program By
At Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:36:35 -0400, Guillaume Marceau wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
In the case of the HtDP languages, was the choice to duplicate all the
text deliberate, or was it a side-effect of some other change?
Yes, this was a
I am currently looking for a place to stay. Were there any people who could
host out-of-town students or any out-of-town students who would want to
split the cost of a hotel room?
Blake
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi
s...@cs.brown.eduwrote:
Also, would any Boston
Why is it pedagogical to repeat information in the
ISL documentation that the BSL documentation already
presented?
-- Matthias
On Jul 6, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Guillaume Marceau wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
In the case of the HtDP languages,
If you read the documentation as a textbook when you start
programming, I can see wanting to see something that says cond is the
same as before. But, if you read the documentation as a reference
when you have a problem it is frustrating to chase through a few links
to get the real documentation.
If it is a click away and if the idea is that students got to B because they
went thru A?
I admit that there are instructors who use only ISL+ or ASL. But should we
accommodate the special ones or the ones that use the language hierarchy as
intended?
On Jul 6, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Jay
A click away can be one too many. Students have enough difficulty
finding documentation as it is. The reference for ISL cond should
include all the necessary details of ISL cond. How about we have a
note saying that ISL cond is the same as ASL cond, then write it all
out anyway. And presumably
On Jul 6, 2011, at 7:11 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
A click away can be one too many. Students have enough difficulty
finding documentation as it is. The reference for ISL cond should
include all the necessary details of ISL cond. How about we have a
note saying that ISL cond is the same as
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
A click away can be one too many. Students have enough difficulty
finding documentation as it is.
Yes...
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
But, if you read the documentation as a
40 minutes ago, John Clements wrote:
1) I just followed clojure's lead.
https://github.com/jbclements/ohcount
Thanks!
I've submitted a pull request. Eli, I added you as a collaborator on
this repo in case you want to add some more sophisticated tests (I
just copied lisp, like Clojure
John Clements wrote at 07/06/2011 08:53 PM:
2) I see that we're in the top 2% of all open-source projects according to
ohloh. Perhaps we should advertise this?
Below is very opinion-heavy seat-of-pants reaction. I'm not familiar
with Ohloh, and I could be off the mark...
The Ohloh
15 minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Below is very opinion-heavy seat-of-pants reaction. I'm not
familiar with Ohloh, and I could be off the mark...
The Ohloh site seems oriented towards PHBs who use 'analysis' like
decreasing year-over-year development activity without wondering
13 matches
Mail list logo
