Somehow I missed this entire thread. Some responses below.
> Let me try to say what I understand out loud:
>
> 1. The existence of Stepper knowledge in the Lazy compiler creates a
> 'spiritual' dependency between the Lazy language and a tool in DrRacket (=
> Tool world). QUESTION: does this know
I think that this is the relevant part of the log, showing the error:
Monday, August 15th, 2011 5:38:17pm:
write-xml-content: received ()
Monday, August 15th, 2011 6:02:19pm:
write-xml-content: received ()
I'm not seeing a stacktrace (probably because I have a bug in my
logging). I don'
I'm updating a few of my PLaneT packages and trying to eliminate
compile-time errors that have been bugging the heck out of me. When I
update the package, I'm seeing the following error message from
PLaneT's web site:
---
Oops! An internal error occured. The problem has been logged, but if
you h
Stephen De Gabrielle wrote at 08/15/2011 02:28 PM:
I'd be interested to see the logs to see if anyone is selecting a
build that differs from their identified user-agent.
OMG, we might be able to settle this with *Science*!
I missed that, and it looks like a group of high-powered CS PhDs might
I'd be interested to see the logs to see if anyone is selecting a build that
differs from their identified user-agent.
If it is a problem, it would be easy enough to bundle a small executable
that initiates the correct download. Or is that silly.
Stephen
On Sunday, August 14, 2011, Stephen Blo
Thanks for the report!
It's an optimizer bug. The bytecode compiler is currently transforming
(let ([h (box 0.0)])
(lambda () h))
to
(lambda () (box 0.0))
which is obviously wrong. I'll work on that.
At Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:48:41 -0600, Doug Williams wrote:
> I downloaded the latest
I downloaded the latest nightly build to test a fix that Matthew pushed.
That fix (a refresh problem) worked, but when I tried to run some
numerically intensive things - like the test for the science collection - I
ran into problems. The science test hangs on the last differential equation
test - e
Matthew Flatt writes:
> At Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:10:11 +0800, Nevo wrote:
> >Does it require other features being disabled in order to build racket
> > without jit?
>
> Yes, you also need `--disable-futures'.
>
> We should fix the `configure' script to either add that automatically
> or compla
At Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:32:48 -0400, Danny Yoo wrote:
> Yes! Here's the problem I'm trying to solve: I'm trying to attach
> information to a module, and then be able to query for that
> information without running the module.
That makes sense. The `dynamic-require-for-syntax' function was
intende
This was a debugging printf in keyword-argument handling, which I'll
remove.
At Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:31:41 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> raco setup: post-installing: racket/gui
> raco setup:
> raco setup: output: during making for browser
> STDOUT:
> (4 2 0)
> =
> raco setup: out
raco setup: post-installing: racket/gui
raco setup:
raco setup: output: during making for browser
STDOUT:
(4 2 0)
=
raco setup: output: during making for tests/drracket
STDOUT:
(3 2 0)
(3 2 0)
(3 2 0)
(3 2 0)
=
raco setup: output: during making for tests/net
STDOUT:
(3 2 0)
(3 2 0
11 matches
Mail list logo
