I have three PLaneT packages that together implement a knowledge-based
simulation capability. I did this because each of the packages is useful in
its own right. The science collection provides the basic mathematical
framework - I use it separately in many analysis applications. The
simulation
On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:52 AM, ro...@racket-lang.org wrote:
| Add the following keybindings in a (hopefully) transparent REPL-friendly
way:
HOW?
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:52 AM, ro...@racket-lang.org wrote:
| Add the following keybindings in a (hopefully) transparent REPL-friendly
way:
HOW?
They keybindings automates what you can already do with some
How does this preserve transparency? Yes, you can break transparency with a
handful of keystrokes of your own, but when you do so, you know you're doing
it. Now you're supporting it, blessing it.
On Sep 22, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:17 AM,
Oh, if what you're saying is that we never had a transparent REPL all
along, then fine. We still don't. (I don't know about blessing.
That's something that type systems and priests do and I'm neither of
those.)
BUT, in my mind, in a practical sense, what we have a better than the
old Emacs style
On Sep 22, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
if what you're saying is that we never had a transparent REPL all
along,
And we also don't have a safe language and we don't have all kinds of stuff.
Please!
_
For list-related
In distributing compiled binaries for Windows, I'm trying to cover all of the
bases for the required DLLs. As far as I can tell from Visual Studio 2010,
there are only two flavors, 32-bit and 64-bit. However, I see that on at least
one of my students' machines, the system-library-subpath
Matthew or someone can give an authoritative answer, but if this lets
you sleep tonight... I suspect the win32 in Racket is fine, and that
Visual Studio just has a backward-compatibility awkwardness in naming.
Win32 was the name of one of the generations of Windows API, and I
believe that
On Sep 22, 2011, at 10:22 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Matthew or someone can give an authoritative answer, but if this lets you
sleep tonight... I suspect the win32 in Racket is fine, and that Visual
Studio just has a backward-compatibility awkwardness in naming.
Win32 was the name of one
9 matches
Mail list logo
