I was against it for similar reasons, but the question is whether
there's a technical point that makes it a bad choice.
As for making errors: I changed my mind when I though about the
symmetry argument -- using the same argument, I'd expect to do the
exact same kind of mistakes with functions,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-12-11 09:32, Eli Barzilay wrote:
This doesn't look like an issue that is related to guile, just that
he chose python as the goal... The first other random example I
tried was `split-string' in Emacs, which did the same thing as
Racket.
7 hours ago, Marijn wrote:
On 30-12-11 09:32, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Without the capturing group the results are identical: [...]
Which is expected.
Good, just establishing a baseline here, but it is good that some
compatibility is *expected*.
I meant that getting the same results is
Now that I'm a whiny junior dev, does that mean I can do the +/-1 thing?
Because after reading Eli's argument - particularly the symmetry
arguments - I'm totally +1-ing his proposal.
This is one of the last places I find myself using the (let () ...)
idiom. (The others are
Another variation, if you're thinking about cloud infrastructure today:
you could pretty easily make your own faux PLaneT server that either is
for a single app or takes the identity/profile of the app as part of the
URL the app uses to access the PLaneT server.
The faux server can be a tiny
I'm not set up to make a pull request on this computer, but core.scrbl needs to
add an s to make contents the field name for multiarg-element, not
content.
-Ian
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Thanks!
At Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:45:01 -0500 (EST), J. Ian Johnson wrote:
I'm not set up to make a pull request on this computer, but core.scrbl needs
to
add an s to make contents the field name for multiarg-element, not
content.
-Ian
_
Racket Developers list:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org wrote:
It's good to see interest in Racket from cloud people. Feel free to ask
lots of questions on the Racket users and dev email lists as you work
through your solution.
Well, this a side-interest for personally, but
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I think that a minor variation on Neil's strategy should not be too
difficult to do (but I'll certainly agree that it is not an ideal
situation). What you'd do is first just download (via the Bam method
below :)
9 matches
Mail list logo
