Re: [racket-dev] Formlets and POST

Jay, hello. On 2012 Feb 20, at 17:51, Jay McCarthy wrote: > I just pushed something to address this. > > It adds a keyword argument to send/formlet to control the method and > defaults it to POST. That sounds like an excellent solution. Best wishes, Norman -- Norman Gray : http://nxg.me

Re: [racket-dev] Formlets and POST

I just pushed something to address this. It adds a keyword argument to send/formlet to control the method and defaults it to POST. Jay On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Norman Gray wrote: > > Greetings. > > Web-server formlets currently send their form input back to the server via an > HTTP GET

Re: [racket-dev] An Improvement to for/set

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 22:20, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > for/set sounds and looks more uniform with the rest of the loops, no? I disagree, I think for/union is a natural analogue for for/product and for/sum. Both for/union and for/set should be in the set library. > union you can throw in as a