Summary: we are currently violating the license of James Clark's XML
test suite, and should fix this.
Currently, the `tests/xml' directory [1] contains a comprehensive
collection tests for XML parsing from James Clark [2]. The
readme.html file [3] in that directory states the license of that
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Doesn't file/gunzip do that?
From the documentation, that seems to be about files that use gzip,
not zip. I didn't think they were the same, but I don't know much
about this stuff.
Trying it, it doesn't seem to
I think you want 'inflate'. IIUC, .zip files contain 'pkzip'-format
compressed stuff.
Robby
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Doesn't file/gunzip do that?
From the
Oh, but I see that this doesn't actually create the files. Probably
something needs to be added to the library.
Sorry.
Robby
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I think you want 'inflate'. IIUC, .zip files contain 'pkzip'-format
compressed stuff.
I think we should just use the system 'unzip', since we currently on
test on platforms that have it anyways. DrDr has unzip and my machines
do (I maintain XML.)
I am also at fault for this, so I can fix it.
Jay
On 3/8/12, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
We have a `file/zip' library
I've made a test collecting macro.
https://gist.github.com/2003201
test.rkt gives you 'define-test'
(define-test id e ...)
will create a module named 'test' that can see you local bindings
(like module* #f) at the end of the module that contains all the code
in e In addition, you get the
One more thing, I anticipate that the 'main' module in my test.rkt
will be raco test and I would extend it to allow you to give a
directory that it will require (if present) all the test modules.
You could also have Test button in DrRacket.
Jay
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Jay McCarthy
This sounds great! I haven't tried it out yet, but here are some
preliminary comments.
On 2012-03-07 10:14:35 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Submodules declared with `module' are declared locally while expanding
a module body, which means that the submodules can be `require'd
afterward by the
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Maybe a pattern that could avoid this is to have something like
#lang racket/main
#:main driver.rkt
#:tests tests.rkt
which would bring in the given modules (in the filesystem) as
submodules. That way you could
At Thu, 8 Mar 2012 15:41:38 -0500, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
This sounds great! I haven't tried it out yet, but here are some
preliminary comments.
On 2012-03-07 10:14:35 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Submodules declared with `module' are declared locally while expanding
a module body, which
I just committed a fix to this.
Jay
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should just use the system 'unzip', since we currently on
test on platforms that have it anyways. DrDr has unzip and my machines
do (I maintain XML.)
I am also at fault
Nice -- just what I wished for last spring. -- Matthias
On Mar 8, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
One more thing, I anticipate that the 'main' module in my test.rkt
will be raco test and I would extend it to allow you to give a
directory that it will require (if present) all the test
I compiled Git head a couple of hours ago and in the middle of my race setup
run I found these:
raco setup: 1 running: readline/readline.scrbl
raco setup: 1 running: redex/redex.scrbl
raco setup: 0 running: scribblings/reference/reference.scrbl
The authenticity of host 'localhost (::1)'
Robby Findler wrote at 03/08/2012 05:45 PM:
Looks like something is trying to ssh while building the docs?
Can whoever figures this out let the list know, or email me privately?
Thanks.
If it turns out that a use of SSH made it into a *released* version of
Racket source, I might have to
Probably mere coincidence, but GitHub has disclosed a security
vulnerability of their service, which was exploited to target Rails
developers and unnamed others:
https://github.com/blog/1068-public-key-security-vulnerability-and-mitigation
Neil Van Dyke wrote at 03/08/2012 06:32 PM:
Robby
I think that the issue probably does not predate Kevin's recent push
(distributed places).
If you'd like to audit the push security concerns, I'm sure that'd be welcome.
Robby
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org wrote:
Robby Findler wrote at 03/08/2012 05:45 PM:
Its an example from the distributed places docs. I'll remove it.
Kevin
On 03/08/2012 06:00 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I think that the issue probably does not predate Kevin's recent push
(distributed places).
If you'd like to audit the push security concerns, I'm sure that'd be welcome.
Robby
17 matches
Mail list logo
