Ok, that gets me past the missing collection exception. Now it crashes
inside libracket3m_8bh1a8.dll. Here's the callstack... this is the stock
5.3 distribution so a stock map file may help:
libracket3m_8bh1a8.dll!0f548983()
[Frames below may be incorrect and/or missing, no symbols loaded for
Eh, scratch that last crash. My erroneous book-keeping with registered
locals.
Carry on...
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Dan Liebgold dan.liebg...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, that gets me past the missing collection exception. Now it crashes
inside libracket3m_8bh1a8.dll. Here's the callstack...
Does anyone have an example of embedding 3m Racket (5.3) in a C++ program
without overriding main? I have a legacy C++ app that wants to eval some
Racket code but I'd like to be minimally invasive. Might need to shell
out...
--
Dan Liebgold[dan.liebg...@gmail.com]
_
Short, short version: I will be working on a new Dracula implementation;
see https://github.com/carl-eastlund/dracula (currently just a bare Racket
fork).
Short version: While the new Dracula is still spiritually ACL2 via
Racket, the new one will be very different from the old. It will be
At Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:10:08 -0700, Dan Liebgold wrote:
Does anyone have an example of embedding 3m Racket (5.3) in a C++ program
without overriding main? I have a legacy C++ app that wants to eval some
Racket code but I'd like to be minimally invasive. Might need to shell
out...
One
Is there any reason the scheme_main_setup trampoline can't be done later in
the program (i.e. only at the point I want to invoke Racket stuff)?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:10:08 -0700, Dan Liebgold wrote:
Does anyone have an
Yes: Racket needs a consistent starting point for the GC'ed stack
across calls into the Racket.
At Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:32:26 -0700, Dan Liebgold wrote:
Is there any reason the scheme_main_setup trampoline can't be done later in
the program (i.e. only at the point I want to invoke Racket stuff)?
7 matches
Mail list logo
