There seems to be a problem with `expand' and `quote'd module names.
You can work around the problem by using `(submod . tmp-module-name)'.
At Mon, 28 Jan 2013 03:30:21 -0500, Stephen Chang wrote:
Actually, moving the rename to the require doesnt work either. But now
there's a different error.
At Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:36:52 -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
[[ I don't really understand the answer. I mean
I understand the technicality but not the spirit. ]]
The 'f' comes from the macro input in both cases.
Hence the rename-out could be seen as the actual
name required.
I recently came across a presentation on the Racket way by Matthew Flatt (
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Racket) and thought that it would be
nice to be able to discover this and similar things more easily. I really
like how all the publications are available on the Racket learning page.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Nick Shelley nickmshel...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently came across a presentation on the Racket way by Matthew Flatt
(http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Racket) and thought that it would be
nice to be able to discover this and similar things more easily. I really
Maybe the main site could just point to the wiki for extra learning
materials.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Danny Yoo d...@hashcollision.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Nick Shelley nickmshel...@gmail.com
wrote:
I recently came across a presentation on the Racket way by
I've just pushed an implementation of the union-find algorithm to the data/
collection. I didn't do it quite the way wikipedia recommends, but instead
made the sets be little containers whose canonical element can be mutated.
This suits my purposes well, but I wanted to ask if someone on the list
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:05:08 +0300, Michael Filonenko wrote:
I have prepared a new version of the patch (attached).
Thanks!
A question on the design here: why not make extflonums part of the
numeric tower?
Also, when
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
This is probably a silly question, but don't you also need some way to
check if two sets have been unioned? Does your application not need
that?
You check to see if their canonical element is the same.
Robby
But I should probably provide that, since it can be done more reliably
inside the library.
Robby
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.eduwrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
This is probably a silly
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Danny Yoo d...@hashcollision.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I've just pushed an implementation of the union-find algorithm to the
data/
collection. I didn't do it quite the way wikipedia
But wouldn't that equate two un-unioned invocations of (uf-new 1)?
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
But I should probably provide that, since it can be done more reliably
inside the library.
Robby
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Robby
Thanks. That's a bug.
uf-set-canonical! changes the canonical element of the set (without
affecting the identity of the set).
Robby
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Danny Yoo d...@hashcollision.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I understood you to be asking for something like this:
(check-equal? (uf-same-set? (uf-new 1) (uf-new 2)) #f)
(check-equal? (uf-same-set? (uf-new 1) (uf-new 1)) #f)
(check-equal? (let ([a (uf-new 1)]
[b (uf-new 1)])
(uf-union! a b)
Yes, exactly. I meant that the strategy of just checking the
canonical element would have the problem I described -- having an
operation for that would fix it.
Sam
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I understood you to be asking for something like
I agree. Listing important videos on unlikely-to-go-away sites seems
important.
Robby
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
1. Pointing to the wiki from racket-lang.org is a good idea.
2. But I agree with the original proposal that we really may
Update: it happens also for system supplied functions, for example
(car 3) displays the same behavior.
However, it happens always, when certain programs are in the editor,
and never with others.
I don't see a pattern. At this moment I cannot attach a file which
causes this (am typing in a
Update 2: it does not depend on buffer content.
I have 9 tab open in this DrRacket. In 5 of them happen the strange
message, in 4 of them it doesn't happen.
I tried closing one in which it happened and then reopening the same
file in a new tab, and in the new tab it doesn't happen.
2013/1/30,
AHA! You got it!
It happens in the tabs which have 'No debugging...' checked, and
doesn't happen otherwise.
2013/1/30, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu:
What is the custom part of the language settings you have on?
Robby
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi
18 matches
Mail list logo
