Hi Jens,
Your binding clause transformers looks very useful. I've definitely hacked
together a subset of your functionality in the past so I will be using your
library in the future.
And I can see the similar goals. We should compare notes. One question,
have you tried to make your def form work
Thanks for all the feedback everyone.
There seems to be some interest so I've uploaded my generic binding
forms to planet2: https://pkg.racket-lang.org/info/generic-bind
I realize it's the pre-semester crunch, but if anyone wants to try it
out, I would be grateful for any feedback.
Here are some
He mentions Racket and the DrRacket OS paper (by name!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PhArSujR_A [about 9 minutes in is the
Racket mention]
Jay
--
Jay McCarthy
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay
"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93
_
This looks great!!
A couple suggestions:
1. Support for "Expect: 100-continue" request headers would be
helpful, and I think not too messy to add.
The big use case I'm aware of is Amazon S3. If you make a PUT or POST
request, it might need to redirect you to another URI (outage,
balancing, whate
I determined this morning that the cause was a bad hash code for my generic
hashes/sets. I use an injection from the value space into the natural numbers
by assigning atoms prime numbers (thanks math/number-theory for next-prime!),
and I multiply them together to produce the encoding of sets (I
Is it possible your analysis is depending on the order of graph traversal?
That is, do you ever use in-hash on the hasheq, and if so is it possible
the results of your analysis would change if in-hash produced hash table
entries in a different order? Same for in-hash-keys or in-hash-values,
obviou
6 matches
Mail list logo
