Re: [racket-dev] current packages' docs, errors, and conflicts

2014-07-10 Thread Matthew Flatt
Yes, `raco setup` with no arguments would succeeded and should fix things up at this point. When you use `raco pkg update`, it effectively passes the `--tidy` flag to `raco setup`. That is, `raco setup --tidy rackjure` would avoid the problem, and it should also fix things up at this point. It's

Re: [racket-dev] racket/fasl allows sandbox escape

2014-07-10 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Credit for this discovery goes to Jens -- I just wrote the email. Sam On Jul 10, 2014 2:36 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: I've pushed a repair. To double-check it, change 1140 to something like 1340, since the table of primitives changed as part of the repair. Thanks for the

Re: [racket-dev] current packages' docs, errors, and conflicts

2014-07-10 Thread Greg Hendershott
Ah, great. I didn't know about --tidy. Thank you. I just pushed this change: https://github.com/greghendershott/rackjure/commit/a70fa27662fd10c3c458f9dce77dff7bc73ef6fc That should clear the rightmost column for all my packages (rackjure, and projects using it). On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:28