On 2014-08-12 06:06:51 +0100, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> What platform are you using?
>
> I imagine that running `./racketcgc` within the "racket" subdirectory
> of your build directory will similarly crash. Can you get any
> information from running `gdb racketcgc`?
This is on Linux. Running the bui
At Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:43:04 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2014-08-12 05:16:21 +0100, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > If you have an existing build in a repo checkout, then `make` is likely
> > to fail, because the makefile dependencies are not precise enough to
> > deal with the switch. You can disca
On 2014-08-12 05:16:21 +0100, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> If you have an existing build in a repo checkout, then `make` is likely
> to fail, because the makefile dependencies are not precise enough to
> deal with the switch. You can discard your old build directory, or it
> might work to simply delete
>
I've changed the Racket CGC implementation --- which is mostly used
only to build the normal Racket variant --- to use SGC by default,
instead of the Boehm GC. The intent of the switch is to make the more
portable GC the default.
If you have an existing build in a repo checkout, then `make` is lik
> Being in the main repo is different from being in the distribution (and thus
> automatically installed). I think that OC should be there when you download
> the full bundle.
Definitely.
1. It's very useful.
2. Its existence says, Racket optimization is a thing.
3. It's used with one of Racket
5 matches
Mail list logo
