My understanding of the licensing issues is that if the code works with
both "libeditline" and "libreadline" then it isn't a derived work of
readline, and therefore could be licensed under the LGPL, like the rest of
Racket. Furthermore, turning use of "libeditline" on by default wouldn't be
linking
Hello,
When a user first starts the racket repl, it doesn't do line editing due to
licensing issues. For example, it would be nice if the default editor would
give the previous line if you hit up arrow, rather than writing "^[[A".
I have now pointed out xrepl to several users, and every time they
I've pushed a fix for the mac os x problem using materialize-user-docs
because it seems to me to reduce rather than enlarge the number of
different configurations are users are in. It may not actually turn
out to be the conservative change and we can always revisit it when we
have more concrete dat
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:16:32 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>>
>> Oh, *that*'s the other solution? That sounds pretty bad not only
>> because it complicates file installation which is already very
>> complex, but also because it's a significant
4 matches
Mail list logo
