>> - The whole distinction between operators and functions is a lie!
>>
> Except it's not. I've run into educators who taught Scheme who
> thought this way, and the accounts of Scheme they gave were nonsense.
>
Perhaps I overspoke; it was the idea that I didn't need *two* syntaxes for
calling (a
I will definitely use p4p next time I teach racket to beginners.
* My only qualms are about "do:" and "if:" as keywords, instead of more
function-like syntax. Looking back at what I found beautiful and elegant
and liberating about scheme the very first time I saw it:
- The whole distinction bet
2 matches
Mail list logo
