Re: [racket-dev] ARM support in the JIT

2013-04-08 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
supported (Raspberry Pi)? I have one of those personally for testing. I noticed that as part of this upgrade COPYING.txt was replaced with the text of the GPLv3, and references to it replaced with COPYING_LESSER.txt (which I'm assuming would be the LGPLv3), but I don't see th

Re: [racket-dev] Any notion of ".jar" files for Racket?

2012-03-06 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
the right invocation is something like: strace -e trace=open -e signal=none drracket On my system, DrRacket 5.2.1 opens almost 1800 files to start. The vast majority (1376) are .zo files, and another 133 are uncompiled .rkt files from the Racket distribution. -- Brian Mastenbrook br

Re: [racket-dev] OS X 10.8 includes new restrictions on running apps

2012-02-22 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
te to protect the rest of the user population." -- Brian Mastenbrook br...@mastenbrook.net http://brian.mastenbrook.net/ _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] racket vs. scheme vs. clojure (as it appears to others)

2011-05-04 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
ive GUI applications on Windows, OS X and X11? I'm having a hard time thinking of any. Surely this is an opportunity for some killer demo programs. -- Brian Mastenbrook br...@mastenbrook.net http://brian.mastenbrook.net/ _ For list-rela

Re: [racket-dev] racket vs. scheme vs. clojure (as it appears to others)

2011-05-04 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
r Racket needs to be as dry and purpose-focused as the Python answer, but it does need to catch the person who wanders in from Google and give them a reason to keep reading to the bottom of the page. So, with that in mind, if I know Java or Python, why do I want to spend the next 10 minutes

Re: [racket-dev] server availability

2011-01-22 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
On 1/22/2011 3:14 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: Yesterday, Brian Mastenbrook wrote: Do you need any help on this? How are you planning on keeping the system clean in the future, (Nothing surprising -- updates, etc, and I added a few things like selinux to the pile.) and do I need to worry about

Re: [racket-dev] server availability

2011-01-21 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
"set it and forget it" systems I tend to use the LTS version of Ubuntu with unattended-upgrades and Ksplice for kernel security patches. There's no guarantee that you won't be affected by a zero-day that way, but at least you can prevent the system from falling behind on a c