On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12/17/2012 05:48 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I'm not sure about this change. If I pass in a buggy function, I'm not
sure I'd want the errors to get swallowed.
The errors are almost always division by zero or some
I can't help with the others, but for 1.) I've considered using a
contract-stronger? test or even just an eq? test when applying a contract,
checking what's already on the value. I haven't added that as it hasn't
come up in anger (and it isn't free, but the check is cheap). If I put a
broken test
I've long thought something along these lines is a good idea, but perhaps
what I think is a good idea isn't what Matthias and Sam think is the bad
idea.
I think that it makes sense for 'require' in typed-racket to look in a
different place than 'require' in untyped racket looks so that one can
foresee this kind of library to become more common, we should
probably provide the capability as an abstraction from TR.
-- Matthias
On Dec 17, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I've long thought something along these lines is a good idea, but
perhaps what I think is a good idea isn't
] *exactly* the same file as in R, so I think Sam's comments are
off base.
Robby
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I've long thought something along these lines is a good idea
that gives types to some bindings (all of the ones from
racket). Your new module's bindings are not in this file.
https://github.com/plt/racket/blob/master/collects/typed-racket/base-env/base-env.rkt
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I don't
That is what I meant to be asking for. I put too much of what I guess would
be a good approach into my messages, tho. Sorry about that.
Robby
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
Okay. I propose we figure out how to allow people programming in Typed
I'm not sure about this change. If I pass in a buggy function, I'm not sure
I'd want the errors to get swallowed.
How about making the plot but putting a red thing on it (and maybe showing
the error text on mouseover)?
Or maybe making this optional behavior?
Robby
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:02
, and I'd like to keep it that way
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
For the purposes of this conversation, I don't think it is fair to stop
after the comma in your sentence, Eric. :)
Robby
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Eric Dobson
If there's no significant performance penalty, then I'd say that we should
make things work between 32bit and 64bit builds.
(If there is a performance penalty then I'd still want to try to achieve
that, at least.)
Robby
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I recently pushed this commit:
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/commit/6babc9ec56d60fba9f3fe6969901a378da266f82
that changes DrRacket's reponse to typing \Deltatex-compress-shortcut.
I see now, however, that this commit changed it FROM U+0394 to U+2206,
ie from Delta to Increment. Here's the
is actually right. I got confused, and I
managed to confuse Robby...
At Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:26:42 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
I recently pushed this commit:
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/commit/6babc9ec56d60fba9f3fe6969901a378da266f82
that changes DrRacket's reponse to typing \Deltatex-compress
Argh. I confuse easily. I think what's currently pushed is right. Knock on wood.
Robby
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
No --- it should be 916 (= #x394), which is Greek uppercase delta.
At Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:34:13 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
Lets
Cool!
Robby
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
We should get one of those signs like in factories: X days accident free.
--
Jay McCarthy j...@cs.byu.edu
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay
The glory of God
That would be great!
And your commit also seems good to me.
I tried to push it to our repo but somehow I can't see to actually get
things locally into the right state so if someone else has time to do that,
I would much appreciate it.
Robby
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012, Philippe Mechaï
Thanks!
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I've now pushed this.
Sam
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
That would be great!
And your commit also seems good to me.
I tried to push it to our repo
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/02/2012 12:10 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Dec 1, 2012, at 9:23 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I think the high-level answer
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:04:15 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I agree that when something is collected is a pretty intentional
property
Let me also say that I think it is important to give advice on how to
test so I think we need to say something.
Robby
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08
and
guarantees) looks pretty good to me. I'll edit and add the suggestion
of N allocations.
At Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:39:09 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
Let me also say that I think it is important to give advice on how to
test so I think we need to say something.
Robby
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012
), though, so if
someone is using lazy-require with unquote outside of the racket git repo,
that will break.
Ryan
On 12/03/2012 07:57 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Does the lazy-require move break code?
Robby
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, ry...@racket-lang.org wrote:
ryanc has updated `master
Thanks, Nadeem!
Robby
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid nad...@acm.org wrote:
Some improvements to DrRacket's automatic parentheses mode are now
available in the nightly build version and git repository. If you have
previous tried auto-parens and abandoned it, or if you have
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Dec 1, 2012, at 9:23 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I think the high-level answer is that you have to understand something
about details that aren't currently specified but nevertheless are how
things currently work
How about using a weak box instead?
Robby
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting ready to push a change to math/array that fixes a memory leak.
I've devised a test that I think will determine whether an array's procedure
gets collected after
a closure, I tried
this:
(define (make-box-thing v)
(make-weak-box (λ (_) v)))
(define bx (make-box-thing 4))
But this `bx' doesn't let go of its value, either. I can't help but think
I'm missing something really stupid, though.
Neil ⊥
On 12/01/2012 10:58 AM, Robby Findler
was
run at the end. I've also got a (collect-garbage) and a (sleep 0) in there.
It works... for now, on my machine.
Maybe a weak box containing a random closure would work. Hmm...
On 12/01/2012 06:46 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
This prints #f for me.
#lang racket
(define (make-box-thing v
to
pass the --slow-me-down-but-automatically-download-missing-packages
flag, or just run this program in drracket.
Robby
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
I agree. Planet 1 currently does this.
Only in drr, where you
30, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Just now, Robby Findler wrote:
In DrR, it isn't looking at the log that tells you this, you get a
special bar appearing in the window. You don't have to do any extra
clicks or anything like that.
(Yeah, take that as a generalized
There should be an menu item about fourth from the end called Spell
Check String Constants.
It won't work if you don't have aspell installed, however. Do you have
it installed? If so, I'm guessing it probably still won't work because
it won't find the binary, sadly. I don't have cygwin on my
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Assuming that it is KMP, is there a reason why we're not using Boyer-Moore
here instead? My understanding was BM was faster than KMP for common
situations.
IIUC, the BM speedup comes from skipping over portions of the
Yes, it would!
In the meantime, you can type
#'for*
and that'll trigger the docs.
The issue is that the documentation is built based on a non-error
expansion of the program. Until we change how that works, there won't
be any of the online check syntax information for parts that are
I think we should change 'case'.
I think we should also add a clear note to the documentation for case
saying this is not the same as 'case' in Scheme because it uses equal?,
not eqv? and giving a few examples to show the difference to head off any
confusion.
Robby
On Monday, November 26, 2012,
');
wrote:
robby has updated `master' from 569af52ffc to ba89a5da92.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/569af52ffc..ba89a5da92
=[ One Commit ]=
Directory summary:
100.0% collects/framework/private/
~~
ba89a5d Robby Findler ro
Okay, I've pushed a fix for a bug that would explain the latest
stacktrace. Please let me know if you spot more problems!
Thanks,
Robby
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Well, probably what's happening is that you got an error earlier
That kind of thing makes a lot of sense to me.
I'd probably write the code a little bit differently, having a
function that takes a string and sees if the text starting at
start-pos matches that string instead of having to special case the
numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. This will also let you just
...@hashcollision.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
That kind of thing makes a lot of sense to me.
I'd probably write the code a little bit differently, having a
function that takes a string and sees if the text starting at
start-pos matches
If you're really worried about the allocation, you can work at the
snip level and pass in a buffer to be filled in with characters, you
know. :)
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Danny Yoo d...@hashcollision.org wrote:
and call it a bunch (inside an 'or', one branch for each of those
strings
Did you try to see if there were any case expressions in our test
suites or while building docs or while starting up and fiddling with
DrRacket that would behave differently with equal??
Robby
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Jon Zeppieri zeppi...@gmail.com wrote:
As a follow-up to the
I'm not sure what that error message means, but I think I was thinking
of a different strategy. Something like this (but where you deal with
'else' properly and write in '#%kernel (so you have to use the
expansion of log-info etc etc)), all staying in the same file.
#lang racket
(provide
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Laurent laurent.ors...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid nad...@acm.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Laurent laurent.ors...@gmail.com wrote:
If you can, I think it would be a good idea to remove the paren pair
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Yesterday, Neil Toronto wrote:
Rho! Cute!
(As much as I like using non-ascii in code now, having a useful Emacs
hack to do that (ρ ρ ρ your ⊥), I think that there are a significant
number of people who would just avoid
I don't think there is a source-level representation that has those
operations explicit in Racket. If you need to change the way closures
are represented to do your experiments, you will probably have to work
at a very low-level.
I think it would help you to look at Casey's model of the Racket
That sounds crazy, man. How about #:keywords instead? If not, then I
think you're better off just going with identifiers.
Robby
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/23/2012 01:47 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
On 11/22/2012 11:33 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Okay, I can't resist: why not use parens?
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/23/2012 03:03 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
That [implicitly quasiquoting array data] sounds crazy, man. How about
#:keywords instead?
Like this?
(array #:keywords
be
that everything is quasiquoted, and then the shape of the parens wouldn't
matter.
Neil ⊥
On 11/23/2012 03:35 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Okay, I can't resist: why not use parens?
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 11/23/2012 03:03 PM, Robby
+lxoqna31rn5jxzkej2onjyqr7o...@mail.gmail.com
Subject: Re: [racket-bug] all/13201: DrRacket file not found message not
immediately cleared after file created
From: Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
To: Kieron Hardy kieron.ha...@gmail.com
Cc: b...@racket-lang.org b...@racket-lang.org,
nob...@racket-lang.org nob
It seems problematic that I cannot send email to bug followups anymore.
I poked around on the webpage, but didn't see anything obvious to fix.
Robby
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
30 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
Does anyone know how to fix
Ah. Thanks. I'll see if I can get our techstaff to let me do the more
complex thing via our SMTP servers.
Robby
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Just now, Robby Findler wrote:
It seems problematic that I cannot send email to bug followups
anymore.
I
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
| [...]
|
| - make queues be sequences directly (and use make-do-sequence
| to implement in-queue instead of building a list)
Should queues also be streams or just sequences?
I didn't think about this: if you think
Oh, I'm not sure. I just picked sequences to fit into for loops.
(Indeed, the code was mostly there already, I just stuck it on the
struct.)
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2012-11-21 12:50:49 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:52
While we're on the subject, I see I re-indented Carl's test cases.
That was an accident and I'm sorry; I didn't mean to.
Robby
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
with an
optional third argument, which relies on more than match-pred anyway.
That's what I'm doing.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
wrote:
I think it is better to have a check-match since that way people are
more likely to find it.
Robby
On Mon, Nov 19
Yes, I think that's the eventual plan.
Robby
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Would it make sense to make this available in the `data' collection?
I'm sure it could be useful beyond syntax coloring.
Vincent
At Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:07:35 -0500,
Score another one for random testing! :)
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Danny Yoo d...@hashcollision.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Pierpaolo Bernardi olopie...@gmail.com
wrote:
How does compare to builtin mutable hashes?
The following code represents a rough hashtable
Hurtado
i...@juanfra.info wrote:
On 11/19/12 03:40, Robby Findler wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's a problem with the contract boundary. The examples work fine in
Typed
Racket. The problem type is this:
(: flomap-transform
(case
Yeah, that is very nice! (It should begin with check not test tho,
right?)
Robby
On Monday, November 19, 2012, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
That is cute. Why don't you just create a pull request and Ryan can
integrate it into rackunit? -- Matthias
On Nov 19, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Joe Gibbs
, 2012, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On 11/19/12 19:21, Robby Findler wrote:
I think it is probably best to have the OpenBSD port be a faithful
match to 5.3.1. This isn't a major bug and hopefully you'll just get
the fix in 5.3.2 or whatever the next version is called in 2-3 months.
Does
such?
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
wrote:
Yeah, that is very nice! (It should begin with check not test tho,
right?)
Robby
On Monday, November 19, 2012, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
That is cute. Why don't you just create a pull request and Ryan can
That might be nice, but a form for including a match pattern seems
like something that would be really great to have.
Robby
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:25 PM, David Van Horn dvanh...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 11/19/12 8:20 PM, Joe Gibbs Politz wrote:
Yeah, that is very nice! (It should begin with
rackunit has check-pred, of course.
Robby
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi s...@cs.brown.edu
wrote:
Predicates in general would be really awesome. I think the testing
infrastructure for Sperber's book (DMDA) has something like this.
Making it lightweight is what
I think it is better to have a check-match since that way people are
more likely to find it.
Robby
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Joe Gibbs Politz j...@cs.brown.edu wrote:
(? P) = (lambda (x) (match x [P true] [_ false]))
I like this quite a bit. It wouldn't be crazy to add it as
I don't know if this is the reason, but I do know that Matthew made
the jit able to see thru some structure operations. Perhaps that
enables some other optimizations now that weren't in 5.3.1.
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Danny Yoo d...@hashcollision.org wrote:
I'm doing some
What are they?
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
i...@juanfra.info wrote:
I'm seeing a weird behavior of the installation of Racket 5.3.1 on OpenBSD
(I don't know if other OS are affected or not).
On amd64 Racket installs this files:
Sounds like a bug to me, then.
Thanks!
Robby
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
i...@juanfra.info wrote:
On 11/19/12 01:13, Robby Findler wrote:
Maybe the difference is that there is a bug on x86, then, as in my
copy of that file I see a bunch of errors
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a problem with the contract boundary. The examples work fine in Typed
Racket. The problem type is this:
(: flomap-transform
(case-
(flomap Flomap-Transform - flomap)
(flomap Flomap-Transform Integer
Well, you can also use git rebase. It basically the same as that, but easier.
Robby
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Kevin Tew t...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Use git format-patch to create patch files for your range of commits and
then apply them to the current head using git am
Kevin
On
I've finally gotten back to this and just pushed something that uses
tooltips for these messages now.
Thanks,
Robby
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Stephen Bloch bl...@adelphi.edu wrote:
I find confusing the caption at the bottom of the dialog that explains what
the currently-selected
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Danny Yoo d...@hashcollision.org wrote:
I wanted to surprise you by getting this all working by mid-week, but it's
taking longer than I thought... :) So I might as well run it by you to make
sure the idea is sound before I go further on this track.
The core
Sorry! I've pushed a change.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Looks like the latest git head i smissing a file:
raco setup: --- installing collections ---
raco setup: --- post-installing collections ---
raco setup: post-installing: help
raco
You know I'm reminded that I did some (simpler) experiments on those
trees too and found that hundreds of thousands of cons cells (I think,
assuming I didn't count wrong) were being implemented when you put the
insertion point just before the first double quote character in
unit.rkt and then type
On Monday, November 12, 2012, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu javascript:; wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
sa...@ccs.neu.edujavascript:;
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Jay McCarthy
Do merge commits cause git bisect to stop working?
If so, can we forbid them on the server?
Robby
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Three hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
Do merge commits cause git bisect to stop working?
They shouldn't, AFAICT, but it might be harder to use it since you
need to be aware of the non-linear structure when you choose
Perhaps it is just me; googling around says that it works fine
But all the examples I see are places where people merged
intentionally. We have never done that.
Robby
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11
Was it actually faster?
Robby
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:46 PM, d...@racket-lang.org wrote:
dyoo has updated `master' from daca1c0d5b to 7618a6a737.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/daca1c0d5b..7618a6a737
=[ 2 Commits ]==
Directory
I think the contracts on struct accessors (and specifically in
scribble core data structures) is significant. If you have ideas on
how to speed them up, that'd be welcome. I think they are set up to be
easily disabled (they are added with a macro somewhere) so you can
time things if you want.
I think it is important that you can get a program from the web, put
it into DrRacket, hit run, and get Something Good to happen, without
having to go type at command lines and whatnot. (This is especially
true for Windows, the platform something like 95% of our users use.)
Robby
On Thu, Nov 8,
? That
would give us the range from full manual control to automatic Something
Good happens, all without command lines.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
wrote:
I think it is important that you can get a program from the web, put
Okay, thanks for the feedback.
I've pushed a change that mostly takes the suggestions, except no blue
and instead of the parentheticals, I've linked to the docs. (I don't
like how the links don't line up vertically so I'll fix that unless
the whole thing is dumped, depending on what people say
Well, I can't say that I'm excited about the prospect of going back to
that dialog. My goal is to move towards no language dialog at all
eventually and that change would not be a step in that direction.
While we wait for others' opinions, I've pushed something that makes
the ellipsis clickable,
The docs links are meant to all be clickable (and I can certainly
underline them). What were you expecting, exactly?
I prefer not to make clicking on the #lang .. part edit the
definitions window; I think copy and paste is probably clearer to the
user.
Robby
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:33 PM,
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
+1
Thank you for the experiment. I am coming to two conclusions:
-- I think we're closer to getting it right
-- I am beginning to think we dont' ever wish to abolish it.
On Nov 6, 2012, at 3:09 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
On 2012-11-06 14:03:50 -0600, Robby
Okay, I've push something to try to deal with this.
Robby
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
OH! I now get the confusion. Clicking on the teaching languages is the
way one interacts with that part of the dialog but the #lang lines are
just text
timer' it doesn't truly work. Let's wait and see.
-- Matthias
On Nov 6, 2012, at 8:17 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Okay, I've push something to try to deal with this.
Robby
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
OH! I now get the confusion. Clicking
I think you missed a revision to the dialog. The currently pushed
version switches you to the The Racket Language when you click on
one of the examples.
Robby
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Stephen Bloch bl...@adelphi.edu wrote:
Clicking on #lang racket brings up a friendly dialog box saying
Thanks for taking a look.
On Monday, November 5, 2012, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
- Allow the presence of a #lang line to override the language dialog,
or at least give an error that's more helpful than currently.
What did you have in mind here? The error you get in the teaching languages
I think it makes sense to put that error message directly into the
teaching languages.
Robby
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Thanks for taking a look.
On Monday
:
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
There was a discussion a while back on revising the language dialog
(I've lost track of the thread since I started hacking on the dialog;
apologies).
The thread starts here:
http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd
There was a discussion a while back on revising the language dialog
(I've lost track of the thread since I started hacking on the dialog;
apologies).
I've just pushed something based on that discussion. Please let me
know what you think.
Robby
_
Racket Developers list:
more network traffic
per push.
Is there something in particular you're worried about?
Even though Matthew is very productive, I think it will be a while until his
activity causes DrDr to mount a denial-of-service attack.
Jay
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Robby Findler ro
a
trusted HTTPS server (like Apache) on DrDr and have it contact that... so it
doesn't rely on the real network. (That is, if we don't want to have the
test spawn a Racket implemented HTTPS server.)
Jay
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
wrote
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
At some point someone (Asumu?) mentioned that this is the only
use of coroutine in our code base. Is this correct?
grep suggests that there are no more (none on planet either).
FWIW, this is still morally a
Maybe in a while (lets see if my change works out).
Robby
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Is it appropriate then to deprecate the library and
to move the code eventually into racket/control-examples?
On Oct 31, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Robby
Apparently it only fails occasionally (at least it passes for me when
I just tried it twice and it didn't fail the last time in drdr).
Probably we should instrument it to see what is going on when it fails.
Robby
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Danny Yoo d...@racket-lang.org wrote:
Does
Was it wrong before? Suboptimal somehow?
On Oct 28, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
samth:
- type-contract fixes/changes (9e1cf579a4, 962f2472e1)
- add #:opaque and #:struct to
Is the first one is something new? Otherwise, I'm not sure that any of
these should be in the release announcement, unless maybe there's something
I'm missing about the changes?
Robby
On Sunday, October 28, 2012, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
At Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:29:43 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper
On second thought, I think we should include all of the bullets
Vincent lists (below) and remove this one Matthew lists:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
* The `for' form now supports `#:break' and `#:final' clauses.
Robby
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:04
Looks like this is something that fails once in a while, eg:
http://drdr.racket-lang.org/25540/collects/tests/gracket/paramz.rktl
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Danny Yoo d...@racket-lang.org wrote:
I received the following report from DrDr:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 5:52 PM,
* DrRacket now runs Check Syntax continuously in the background
(by default; this was available in previous releases, but
disabled by default)
Robby
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
The release announcement sketch that I have so far is below. Please
I believe this is the first release where online check syntax is enabled by
default. I'm not sure, but I also think that it hasn't been mentioned in
the release notes before.
Robby
On Wednesday, October 24, 2012, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
The release announcement sketch that I have so far is
401 - 500 of 1296 matches
Mail list logo
