Can't we do better than a memo table?
On Thursday, June 6, 2013, wrote:
stamourv has updated `master' from 5ea3a1ce6d to 6e8c9ed15a.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/5ea3a1ce6d..6e8c9ed15a
=[ 2 Commits ]==
Directory summary:
82.9%
Also if you're going to memoize things, why are you using assoc rather than
a hash table? Or if at all possible, a weak hash table?
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.eduwrote:
Can't we do better than a memo table?
On Thursday, June 6,
At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 18:39:57 -0400,
Carl Eastlund wrote:
Also if you're going to memoize things, why are you using assoc rather than
a hash table? Or if at all possible, a weak hash table?
I'm using `procedure-closure-contents-eq?' as the equality predicate.
AFAIK, there's no hash table for
Maybe. I'll see if I can think of a better solution.
Vincent
At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:35:50 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
Can't we do better than a memo table?
On Thursday, June 6, 2013, wrote:
stamourv has updated `master' from 5ea3a1ce6d to 6e8c9ed15a.
Good point. Might be an argument for a
procedure-closure-contents-hash-code function. Of course, never mind that
if you can forego memoization entirely.
Carl Eastlund
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 18:39:57 -0400,
Carl Eastlund
5 matches
Mail list logo
