Just now, Laurent wrote:
>
> Maybe we could consider dictionaries for the replacement lists?
No, because the keys are regexp patterns, so there's no point in using
dictionaries.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Yesterday, Laurent wrote:
> > add1
> > I also use such a function from time to time, and I'd be happy to
> > have it in the string or regexp libs.
>
> I'll assume that without other replies, there are no objections to
> adding it?
>
> Also, a
Yesterday, Laurent wrote:
> add1
> I also use such a function from time to time, and I'd be happy to
> have it in the string or regexp libs.
I'll assume that without other replies, there are no objections to
adding it?
Also, at least as a start, I'm thinking of a function that looks just
like the
add1
I also use such a function from time to time, and I'd be happy to have it
in the string or regexp libs.
Laurent
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> While scanning code for a minor incompatible in a commit, I ran into
> this function which is the ffi collection of all pla
While scanning code for a minor incompatible in a commit, I ran into
this function which is the ffi collection of all places. (See the
docs for what it does.) Given that this comes up often, maybe it's
time to add this to `racket/string'?
(Or maybe `racket/private/string' next to the other regex
5 matches
Mail list logo