On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Tobias Hammer tobias.ham...@dlr.de wrote:
Tested it too and got an interesting result. On a 32bit linux its:
+nan.0
+nan.0
+nan.0
+nan.0
+nan.0
+nan.0
+nan.0
+nan.0
That's what I get too.
And indeed my other machine was a 64bits Ubuntu and Racket.
Back on list.
A lot of things point to general sloppiness in either the FPU or C
libraries, but I'd like more information just in case. Can you reply
with the values of the following expressions on the Athlon?
(flexpt -1001.0 -1.3407807929942596e+154)
(flexpt -1001.0
DrDr runs (test-floating-point 1000) every push, which has returned only
'() for weeks. In your output, I don't see anything that would indicate
a problem with Racket. We can almost certainly pin the blame on your
processor or the standard libraries on your platform.
Even though you got
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
DrDr runs (test-floating-point 1000) every push, which has returned only '()
for weeks. In your output, I don't see anything that would indicate a
problem with Racket. We can almost certainly pin the blame on your
On 02/07/2013 12:09 PM, Laurent wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com
mailto:neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
Today is not that day, but thanks for asking about this anyway. :)
On one machine with Ubuntu 12.10, I get no error, but on another machine
with
5 matches
Mail list logo