Thanks for the pull request (and sorry for the delay in replying here).
I've pushed your commit and another one that covers things like docs and
otherwise a few other changes to your commit. Please let me know if things
don't work out for you.
Robby
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:47 PM, William J. B
I am at Northeastern. I use my own address as a central point for the
multiple present and past addresses, and usually don't bother
spoofing the `from' header. Perhaps I'll add a note about that to my
email signature.
Thanks for the tips about reduction semantics!
I've created a pull request.
W
Yeah, I agree it does make sense to do this kind of merging with examples
like the one you posted or else you get very very bad performance in
matching. And the merging is coming about because of the way the language
is structured; it isn't accidental "lucky" merging; you expect the same
production
By the way, when I was tinkering, I originally got my example working
*without* merging nts (lines 1967-1983). I only added it after
inspecting the output of `compiled-lang-lang'. The resulting
union-language had the same nonterminal in a language several times with
overlapping right-hand-sides, so
I had a feeling I was doing something wrong, but I'm not familiar enough
with the Redex source to do much more than hack until it does what I
want :)
Here is a small example of what I'd like to do:
https://gist.github.com/bluephoenix47/5059837
This example seems to work with my patch, but obviou
The reason I didn't do that is very much related to lines 1967-1983 in your
diff.
That isn't a good idea: what you really want to do there is check to see if
different patterns generate the same languages or not. But that's not
something that is easily done (I'm guessing it is computable, but very
Hello all,
I've been hacking on some languages in Redex, and found myself
abstracting commons parts into base languages, and gradually building new
languages via `define-extended-language' and `define-union-language'.
Unfortunately, I hit a wall when I discovered `define-union-language'
doesn't l
7 matches
Mail list logo