Re: [racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-30 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@cs.indiana.edu wrote: All the history for the code has been preserved, and for code that dates back before 2005, the history is extended back to the original CVS

Re: [racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-30 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@cs.indiana.edu wrote: # Changes for git users If you build Racket from source from Git, that build now contains fewer packages. There is not yet an single-step way to get all of the split pkgs as git repositories; we plan to write a

Re: [racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-30 Thread Greg Hendershott
Sam gave me a heads-up on IRC. Also, DrDr now builds several packages that it didn't before: the s3-sync, sha, http, and aws packages. Currently, these packages have some test failures, but we hope to fix that soon. I'm responsible for aws, http, and sha. I'm working on this. I'm close to

Re: [racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-30 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Sat, 29 Nov 2014 22:00:44 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@cs.indiana.edu wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@cs.indiana.edu wrote:

Re: [racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-30 Thread Greg Hendershott
I believe I've fixed everything shown on http://drdr.racket-lang.org/29582/racket/share/pkgs/ for which I'm responsible: aws: Commits merged to master and pushed. http: Fixed a buggy test mishandling 301/302 redirects. sha: Nothing needed to be fixed. I'll keep an eye on DrDr; Sam said he'd

[racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-29 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
As Matthias mentioned in his email a few days ago, we're in the process of splitting the repository so that it doesn't bundle together so many packages. I've started this process already, and a number of packages have already been split out. For most people, this won't have a big impact, but I'll

Re: [racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-29 Thread Eli Barzilay
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@cs.indiana.edu wrote: All the history for the code has been preserved, and for code that dates back before 2005, the history is extended back to the original CVS repository. See https://github.com/racket/games/ for an example of this.

Re: [racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-29 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@cs.indiana.edu wrote: All the history for the code has been preserved, and for code that dates back before 2005, the history is extended back to the original CVS

Re: [racket-dev] Splitting the Racket repository

2014-11-29 Thread Eli Barzilay
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@cs.indiana.edu wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@cs.indiana.edu wrote: All the history for the code has been preserved, and for