On 09/11/2012 07:29 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
It doesn't seem to matter how I set up the evaluator (using
`make-base-eval' or `make-evaluator'). If an example fails to typecheck,
it looks like an ugly documentation error. This is an actual example in
the math docs, which I would really like to keep
It doesn't seem to matter how I set up the evaluator (using
`make-base-eval' or `make-evaluator'). If an example fails to typecheck,
it looks like an ugly documentation error. This is an actual example in
the math docs, which I would really like to keep:
> (flabs (exact->inexact 0.5f0))
eval:8
2 matches
Mail list logo
