Yesterday, Matthew Flatt wrote:
[...]
(Sidenote: it would be nice if `--fix-pkg-deps' or something similar
could also report redundant dependencies.)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is
The `raco setup' tool now checks declared package dependencies against
actual library dependencies. Use `--no-pkg-deps' or `-K' to skip the
check (which takes 5-6 seconds on my machine).
PLEASE pay attention to dependency-declaration errors before you push a
commit that might introduce them!
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Practically every package will need a dependency on base, which is a
package that represents the libraries in the core; it's the
package-level analogue of having to start every module with `#lang
racket'. The idea is
At Sat, 29 Jun 2013 10:27:44 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Practically every package will need a dependency on base, which is a
package that represents the libraries in the core; it's the
package-level analogue
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
There is one dependency problem, currently: drracket depends on
htdp through a test. That problem was created by a commit before
dependency checking was available, and we'll get it fixed.
I currently get the error:
raco
At Sat, 29 Jun 2013 15:46:16 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
There is one dependency problem, currently: drracket depends on
htdp through a test. That problem was created by a commit before
dependency checking was
6 matches
Mail list logo
