Thanks for all the feedback everyone.
There seems to be some interest so I've uploaded my generic binding
forms to planet2: https://pkg.racket-lang.org/info/generic-bind
I realize it's the pre-semester crunch, but if anyone wants to try it
out, I would be grateful for any feedback.
Here are some
What are the performance implications of this design? Specifically how do
overlapping uses fare in the two systems? Microbenchmarks okay for now. --
Matthias
On Aug 26, 2013, at 12:54 AM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> Hi dev,
>
> I've noticed that Racket has a lot of convenient binding forms but
>
lab today.
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: "Jay McCarthy"
To: "Stephen Chang"
Cc: "dev"
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 8:27:06 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] generic binding forms
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Stephen Chang
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> Hi dev,
>
> I've noticed that Racket has a lot of convenient binding forms but
> they don't fit together unless someone does it manually (for example
> there's match-let and match-let-values, but no match-for).
>
> As an educational side pro
Hi Stephen,
> As an educational side project, I've been toying around with a
> different way of organizing all the binding forms. What I wanted to do
> is remove the need to manually combine current (and future) binding
> forms by moving the binding "logic" to the binding site itself.
Your goals
Hi dev,
I've noticed that Racket has a lot of convenient binding forms but
they don't fit together unless someone does it manually (for example
there's match-let and match-let-values, but no match-for).
As an educational side project, I've been toying around with a
different way of organizing all
6 matches
Mail list logo
