+1 on the delay.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
+1 on the delay. I prefer to wait more to get the great quality always
provided by the releases.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Danny Yoo d...@cs.wpi.edu wrote:
+1 on the delay.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
--
Eduardo Bellani
I think it is good to wait until the release is ready. There is no rush ... I
prefer slower but better.
Saludos,
Karn
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Agreed.
It may also give you/us more time to play with submodule and not be too
afraid of backward compatibility in case you'd like to change something.
Laurent
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 22:43, Karn Kallio tierplusplusli...@gmail.comwrote:
I think it is good to wait until the release is ready.
We (release management) are thinking of skipping this release and
wanted to see if anyone minded first. Below is a possible message we
would send to justify this to the external folk.
Dear Racketeers,
as we are preparing the v5.3 release, we notice unexplored corners
of new and revised
One opinion: I appreciate the diligence and caution. That Racket's
releases are high quality is one of the attractions of the platform. I
can wait a few more months for submodules.
Neil V.
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_
Racket Developers list:
6 matches
Mail list logo