Re: [racket-dev] skip release

2012-04-24 Thread Danny Yoo
+1 on the delay. _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] skip release

2012-04-24 Thread Eduardo Bellani
+1 on the delay. I prefer to wait more to get the great quality always provided by the releases. On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Danny Yoo d...@cs.wpi.edu wrote: +1 on the delay. _  Racket Developers list:  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev -- Eduardo Bellani

Re: [racket-dev] skip release

2012-04-24 Thread Karn Kallio
I think it is good to wait until the release is ready. There is no rush ... I prefer slower but better. Saludos, Karn _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] skip release

2012-04-24 Thread Laurent
Agreed. It may also give you/us more time to play with submodule and not be too afraid of backward compatibility in case you'd like to change something. Laurent On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 22:43, Karn Kallio tierplusplusli...@gmail.comwrote: I think it is good to wait until the release is ready.

[racket-dev] skip release

2012-04-23 Thread Matthias Felleisen
We (release management) are thinking of skipping this release and wanted to see if anyone minded first. Below is a possible message we would send to justify this to the external folk. Dear Racketeers, as we are preparing the v5.3 release, we notice unexplored corners of new and revised

Re: [racket-dev] skip release

2012-04-23 Thread Neil Van Dyke
One opinion: I appreciate the diligence and caution. That Racket's releases are high quality is one of the attractions of the platform. I can wait a few more months for submodules. Neil V. -- http://www.neilvandyke.org/ _ Racket Developers list: