Robby Findler wrote at 08/13/2011 06:06 PM:
This is the PLaneT bug reports, not the drracket bug reports.
I suspect that the Racket-knowledge captcha would be even more
appropriate for PLaneT package bug reports than for general Racket bug
reports.
I think that requiring logins will disc
About a minute ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> This is the PLaneT bug reports, not the drracket bug reports.
>
> I'm loathe to restrict that to people that login, but maybe it is
> time for that.
You can use the same captcha that I used in the main bugs page. I can
make the files accessible to plane
This is the PLaneT bug reports, not the drracket bug reports.
I'm loathe to restrict that to people that login, but maybe it is time for that.
Robby
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Captcha that requires a very tiny amount of Racket/Scheme/Lisp knowledge or
> access to a
Captcha that requires a very tiny amount of Racket/Scheme/Lisp knowledge
or access to a working Racket/Scheme interpreter might work. Example
challenges:
(+ 1 2)
(+ 1 (* 2 3))
(apply + (cons 1 (cons 2 '()))
(string-append "x" "y")
If spammers want to spend time on this, hey, maybe they'll get
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Well, someone has figured out how to defeat the recaptcha thingy and
> I'm now getting about (on average, ish) two spam bug reports per hour
> for the last several days (and a slower, but still annoying rate for
> several weeks before that).
Well, someone has figured out how to defeat the recaptcha thingy and
I'm now getting about (on average, ish) two spam bug reports per hour
for the last several days (and a slower, but still annoying rate for
several weeks before that).
Any advice? (poking around the web suggests that captchas are
6 matches
Mail list logo
