At Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:36:52 -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> [[ I don't really understand the answer. I mean
>I understand the technicality but not the spirit. ]]
>
> The 'f' comes from the macro input in both cases.
> Hence the rename-out could be seen as the actual
> name required.
There seems to be a problem with `expand' and `quote'd module names.
You can work around the problem by using `(submod "." tmp-module-name)'.
At Mon, 28 Jan 2013 03:30:21 -0500, Stephen Chang wrote:
> Actually, moving the rename to the require doesnt work either. But now
> there's a different erro
Actually, moving the rename to the require doesnt work either. But now
there's a different error.
Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.3.2.2 [3m].
Language: racket [custom].
. . ..\..\plt\collects\racket\require-transform.rkt:266:2:
syntax-local-module-exports: unknown module
module name: #
>
On Sat,
[[ I don't really understand the answer. I mean
I understand the technicality but not the spirit. ]]
The 'f' comes from the macro input in both cases.
Hence the rename-out could be seen as the actual
name required.
On Jan 26, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 26 Jan 201
Thanks for the clarification.
On Jan 26, 2013 6:55 AM, "Matthew Flatt" wrote:
> At Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:12:04 -0500, Stephen Chang wrote:
> > Is this a supported use of submodules?
> >
> >
> > #lang racket
> >
> > (define-syntax (def-wrapped stx)
> > (syntax-case stx ()
> > [(_ (f arg ...)
At Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:12:04 -0500, Stephen Chang wrote:
> Is this a supported use of submodules?
>
>
> #lang racket
>
> (define-syntax (def-wrapped stx)
> (syntax-case stx ()
> [(_ (f arg ...) body ...)
> #'(begin
> (module tmp-module-name racket
>(define (f-tmp
Is this a supported use of submodules?
#lang racket
(define-syntax (def-wrapped stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
[(_ (f arg ...) body ...)
#'(begin
(module tmp-module-name racket
(define (f-tmp arg ...) (displayln "wrapper") body ...)
(provide (rename-out [f-tmp
7 matches
Mail list logo
