On Saturday, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Sat, 2 Jul 2011 12:34:49 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
I read the guide chapter -- it has a few typos:
1. The page is stx-certs.html.
Intentional, though I'm not sure it's a good idea. There's a small
benefit of keeping the URL the same and making old
On 06/30/2011 05:01 AM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Matthew Flattmfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
The problem with having the macro transformer add `syntax-protect' for
(define-syntax bar
(lambda (stx) ...))
is that some other transformer can say
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Stephan Houben steph...@planet.nl wrote:
Something like this springs to mind:
(define-syntax provide/protection
(syntax-rules ()
((_ name)
(begin
(define-syntax tmp
(syntax-rules ()
((_ . args) (name . args
I read the guide chapter -- it has a few typos:
1. The page is stx-certs.html.
2. There's still one mention of certificate.
3. Some modules are referred to by name where there is no such name.
For example, the q module (I'm pretty sure that there were more).
4. Talks about defining
At Sat, 2 Jul 2011 12:34:49 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
I read the guide chapter -- it has a few typos:
1. The page is stx-certs.html.
Intentional, though I'm not sure it's a good idea. There's a small
benefit of keeping the URL the same and making old links to the
certificate chapter point to
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I've pushed a change to Racket's macro system that throws out the
syntax-certificate system and adds a syntax-taint system.
Syntax taints, like syntax certificates before, are intended to
protect macro expansions from
8 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I've pushed a change to Racket's macro system that throws out the
syntax-certificate system and adds a syntax-taint system.
Syntax taints, like syntax certificates before, are
A few seconds ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
8 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I've pushed a change to Racket's macro system that throws out the
syntax-certificate system and adds a syntax-taint system.
Syntax
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few seconds ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
8 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I've pushed a change to Racket's macro system that throws out the
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
* If you write program-processing tools or languages that use
`syntax-recertify', you'll need to change them to use
`syntax-disarm' and possibly `syntax-rearm'.
Does this change (more generally than the part I've
8 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
wrote:
Things you need to know:
* When writing a macro (without `syntax-rules', `define-syntax-rule',
or `syntax-id-rules'), apply `syntax-protect' to the macro's
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
8 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
wrote:
Things you need to know:
* When writing a macro (without `syntax-rules',
12 matches
Mail list logo
