Re: [racket-dev] JIT question

2013-05-07 Thread Jon Zeppieri
Thank you! On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > I think you're right: line 1851 is useless. > > I added line 1851 weeks after writing the surrounding code. At the time > that I added line 1851, the real repair was changing line 1859 to use > `dest' as the destination. I didn't p

Re: [racket-dev] JIT question

2013-05-07 Thread Matthew Flatt
I think you're right: line 1851 is useless. I added line 1851 weeks after writing the surrounding code. At the time that I added line 1851, the real repair was changing line 1859 to use `dest' as the destination. I didn't pay enough attention to see that the slow path is a failure path, so no resu