Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.2 has begun

2011-10-09 Thread Doug Williams
I downloaded the latest pre-release version (5.1.900.1) to update the science collection to use the new plot collection. The good news is that that went very smoothly. The bad news is that some of my FFT routines seem to be getting incorrect numeric results - at least the plots are very bad. But,

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.2 has begun

2011-10-09 Thread Doug Williams
I reloaded the older version of Racket on my Windows 7 computer and the radix-2 FFTs run fine there. I also tested both versions on my Macbook Pro (32 bit) and got the same behavior - correct results (plots) on 5.1.2 and bad radix-2 results (plots) on 5.1.900.1. code for the mixed-radix and

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.2 has begun

2011-10-09 Thread Matthew Flatt
Fixed. Some unsafe primitives were marked internally as functional, but this annotation was used with two different interpretations: sometimes as non-mutating, sometimes as always produces the same result. The `unsafe-vector-ref' primitive was marked as functional with the former intent, but the

Re: [racket-dev] Release for v5.2 has begun

2011-10-09 Thread Doug Williams
Let me know if you want me to break anything else. My mom always hated it when I was a kid, but it seems to be useful on pre-releases. On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: Fixed. Some unsafe primitives were marked internally as functional, but this